British Intrigue and American Intercourse Policy Notes
Long letters from Boston dated March to May 1809 discuss non-importation and interference with commerce, the risks of war with Britain and France, and the effect on federal and democratic parties. The writer analyzes Madison administration motives, northern versus southern state tensions, and potential British strategy to split the union while urging vigilance and cautious diplomacy.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Elke Tegy Zeiter
Pherty
France
America
Engladin
England
Europe
U. S
Bonaparte
Federal Party
Lam
Boston
Martinique
Worthington
Massachusetts
Congress
Britain
Lew
Citcem
Lam, &c
New England
New Hampshire
Connecticut
Jefferson
Washington
Iam
Bertin
Talen
Atlantic
New- England
Erskine
Democrats
Atte&t
Great Britain
G. B
National Intelligencer
Madison
Fatlin
England’s conduct in U S affairs debated in 1812 Chronicle
The piece criticizes Anglophone policy during early 1800s tensions, arguing Washington honored neutrality while Britain pressed isolation, seizing seamen and sowing division. It defends Henry’s disclosures then questions their credibility, noting letters from Liverpool and Craig and Count de Crillon support. It cites Congress reviews and calls for transparency.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Henry
England
France
U States
America
Washington
United States
Congress
Bri
Cates
Henry ; Without ‘Taking ’Mr. Henry
Earl Liverpool
James Craig
Committee of Foreign Relations
House of Representatives
Munroe
Pinkney
Count de Crillon
Boston
Eiher
Federal Party
Mr. Henry
Craig
Liverpool
House of Commons
Amecas
Also Mentioned on This Page
Bofin
Nothern
Fouth
Tie
Bae
Fia