Tariff debate shows split parties and aims for revenue
The editor surveys the Cleveland tariff stance, arguing the bill is a hybrid faltering between protection and revenue. It critiques economics of tariffs, favors revenue with selective protection, and warns specific duties favor the rich while urging broader justice and economic policy. Concluded next week.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Cleveland
Congress
Wall Street
Rome
Democratic Party
United States
Treasury
Harrison
Democrat Party
People's Party
Republican Party
Legislatures
Democrat
Ften
Also Mentioned on This Page
Challig
Iprho
Seopficial Paper
Custer County
R. A. Pierce, M. M. Sweet
America
Challis
Challis, Idaho
Mrs. A. Butters
Idaho
A.C. Bumar
Jeweler
Spalding's
Jeger
J.H. Pitzer
Clayton, Idaho
City Drug Star
John P. Spalding
Prop
J.s Jones
Challig, Idehc
Sahar
F.O. Smith
Ss. Joe
R. N. Huw
Curis
Moiler
R. N. Hull & C4
Merchand
Seth
R.N. Hull & C