Bite mark analysis under fire in courtrooms
The AP review shows bite mark analysis is widely questioned as unreliable forensic science. DNA advances have reduced its role while experts warn bias in testimony taints results. cases like Ray Krone highlight exonerations after decades behind bars. Two recent trials push the debate into courtrooms.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
FBI
American Dental Association
Chris Fabricant
New York
Frank Wright
Cincinnati
Associated Press
Innocence Project
California
New York City
Mississippi
New Mexico
Bite mark evidence under scrutiny in exoneration case
The case centers on DOUG PRADE of AKRON and bite mark testimony vs DNA results. Prosecution appeals his release after DNA refuted a 1998 conviction linked to his teeth while noting Margo Prade’s murder and past jury findings.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Krone
Newport
Tenn
Rawson
Texas
Doug Prade
Akron
Madison Correctional Institution
London
Margo Prade
Prade
Ave
Thomas Marshall
Marshall
Fabricant
The
Innocence Project
Also Mentioned on This Page
Ray Krone
Phoenix
Raymond Rawson
Las Vegas
American Board of Forensic Odontology
PWC
Boraincountymoms.com
Bundy
Florida
Lisa Levy
Richard Souviron
U.S
OF the
Regust Geer
Ea Acres
W. Herrick Ave
Ebay
Hollandcomputers.com
Roose & Ressler
Weeds
Essler
Wee Eeu Association
Elyria
Broad ST