End of A and P as you know it if trust suit wins
The author argues against Washington anti trust lawyers suing A and P. They claim the action will destroy A and P, raise prices, and harm workers and customers by breaking up stores and factories. They warn the public to expect loss of familiar low prices and employee benefits.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Anti-Trust
Washington
A&p
A&P’s
George L. Hartford
John A. Hartford
A&P price claim faces antitrust suit
The piece argues the antitrust case against A&P will raise, not lower, grocery prices. It contends A&P manufactures brands like Bokar and Eight O Clock, passes savings to customers, and that removing A&P would increase wholesale costs and final prices.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
A&p
A&P under threat would hurt price competition and growth
The passage argues that destroying A and P would curb vigorous price competition, harm big buyers and sellers, set a dangerous legal precedent, and undermine the American standard of living by restricting efficient distribution and cheap goods. It warns anti-trust lawyers seek to redefine laws to reduce competition.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
A&p
Also Mentioned on This Page
Bokar
Red Circle
Ann Page Foods
White House
Pacific Tea Company
Amagwernl
Niewspaper