Letters Debate Cook Peary Rivalry Spark Reader Interest
Readers flood the Post with views on the Cook Peary controversy. Some letters question Cook's credibility and insist Peary is the reliable explorer. One writer slams Cook as deceptive and favors Peary's documented record, urging Peary’s word as trustworthy. September 16, 1909.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
The
Post
Pole discovery debate pits Cook against Peary
A letter from South Boston argues for Dr Frederick A Cook as the North Pole discoverer and questions the Peary claim. It defends Cook’s presence in polar regions and cites Shackleton and Danish scientists as supporting evidence. The writer asserts the pole is open to any who reach it and notes Peary’s choice of a black companion as controversial.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Pole
Brooklyn
Whitney
Cook
Arctic
Peary
T. Wharf
Polar
Shackleton
Frederick A. Cook
North Pole
Robert E. Peary
Big Nail
South Boston
Dr Wu Ting fang on polar claim and air travel
Dr Wu Tingfang, arriving from Peru, questioned the North Pole dispute and praised American energy. He predicted possible China to New York air travel within years and urged sharing glory, citing Admiral Schleynag on broad American enterprise.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
New York
Wu Tingfang
Peru
North Pole
South Pole
Oruba
Hatteras
Also Mentioned on This Page
Henry Siegel Co
Boston
Mass
London
Coats
Merit and Telephone
New England
Sir Henri
Siegel
Iasts
Goodyear Wells
Osaturday
Rosebery
Ia AN
Gawi
Madras
Henry Siegel Co. Ma
Telephone
Ord
Columbia Graphophones
Columbia Double
ATP
Cupid
Havana
Liza
Paris
Henry Siegel Co., Mz
Dr. Cook