Complete Answer by Defendant in Emma Douglas Divorce
The lengthy defense denies charges from paragraphs 44 to 70, detailing finances, housekeeping, meals, servants, travel, and alleged cruelty. It claims plaintiff dominated household affairs, manipulated servants, overspent, and caused disputes over food and lights, while defendant portrays himself as attentive and financially prudent. The document recounts visits, trips, and a disputed October 1908 separation prompted by a letter from defendant’s sister, arguing no ongoing severe mistreatment and disputing allegations of harsh conduct.