Great Salt Lake vs Snake River in High Court
The 1904 Utah Idaho case in High Court of Reason debates water rights between Snake River and Great Salt Lake. Testimony portrays Snake River as vital for commerce and irrigation, while court affirms Idaho river rights within its borders and dismisses Idaho’s claim for outside water use, upholding River water rights with costs.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Great Salt Lake
Snake River
Circuit Court of
Idaho County
State of Utah
Equity
Wm. F. Salisbury
Thos. Kearns
Anny
First Presidency
Council of the Twelve Apostles
River Friends
Congress
Fred.t. Dubois
Rocky Mountains
Utah
Salt Lake City
Columbia
Oregon
Washington
Burton French
Kearns
Idaho
Dubois
High Court of Reason
Washington, D. C
Lake
High Court
Washington, D
Temple of Justice
James L. Cincinnatus
Great
Salt Lake
Pacific Coast
River life as a portrait of human growth and love
The piece likens life to a river from infancy to death, then rebirth, urging that love lifts the self and culture elevates thought. It defends quiet, virtuous work as national strength, and describes culture as the love of higher thoughts accessible to all.
Also Mentioned on This Page
Silver Messenger
Sweet
Idahs
Challis
EU Eon
R. N. Huns
Eees
James Gayle
W. H. Fleexer
Wee
R.N. Hull
General Merchandise
Custer County
William Buster
Prop
F.mckgison&co
Oaallis, Ida