Abolition Court Debate on Matilda Case in Ohio
The Ohio habeas case questions if Matilda, a colored woman claimed as a fugitive, is unlawfully detained. Arguments focus on whether a state warrant and federal fugitive labor act process validly justified detention and magistrate power.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Iadio
Hawkins
Justices of the Peace
Riley
Act of Congress
Congress
United States
Ohio
Missouri
Ted
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Law of
New Jersey
Supreme Court
Ryerson
Frelinghuysen
Hich
Shaw
Massachusetts
Mayes
Mr. C
R. T. Lyris
Speech of Salmon P. Chase in Matilda habeas case 1837 Ohio
The document records Salmon P. Chase arguing before the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas in a March 11 1837 habeas corpus hearing concerning a colored woman named Matilda. It outlines the legal dispute over her detention and Chase’s defense or request for relief.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Matilda
Court of Common Pleas
Hamilton County
Ohio
State of
Sam’ Fospicx
Writ of Habeas Corpus in 1837 Cincinnati Case
Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County issues a writ of habeas corpus for Matilda a mulatto slave confined in the county jail. The document includes the writ return, a commitment by Justice William Doty, an affidavit by John W Riley, and a defendant Larkin Lawrence slave case stating Matilda fled Missouri in 1836.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Petitior
Ohio
Matilda
John W. Riley
Larkin Lawrence
Missouri
Lawrence
State of
Hamilton County
William Doty
Said
William
Larkin
Also Mentioned on This Page
Pilar
Cincinnati
Ohio State Anti-Slavery Society
Carl & Alley, Printers
C. K. Pacman
Sheriff’s Return
Argins Court
8. P. Cuasx
8. Ens
M. N. Mee Gen
R. T. Lrrex
N. C. Rian
Cuase
Prion
Ohi
Lunsford
Coquillon
Martin's
Louisiana
Rankin
Lydia
Marshall
Howell
Hawkins’ Pleas of the Crown
O. L
Commt
Thero
Flae
IND
Salmon P. Chase
Anton
Éurt
W. H. Hannises
Wm. Doty
State of Ohio
Gaxetrye
William Dorr
J. P
Joax W. Rizer
Swort
Ww. Dorr, J. P
Hamilon County