The Versailles Peace League Debate Weighs American Sovereignty
The piece reviews heated arguments over the League of Nations and Versailles terms. It argues that American nationalism and constitutional governance should dominate any international framework, criticizing Britain’s gains and warning of sovereignty loss.
Questioning League of Nations sacrifices and sea dominion
The speaker argues real world change requires sacrifice and sovereignty surrender for peace. He asks what sacrifice the United States would make upon joining the league and notes Britain’s view on freedom of the seas and its maritime dominance after the war.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Montgomery
Advertiser Dem
Versailles
America
League of Nations
Mr. Borah
England
United States
Washington
Monroe
Robert Cecil
Hitchcock
Borah
Great Britain
France
Russia
Earth
League
Nebraska
Senate
Missouri
Mr. Reed
Idaho
Europe
Japan
Italy
Liberia
Haiti
Hedjaz
Honduras
Nicaragua
Siam
India
Jones
New Mexico
Reed
Balfour
Council
Assembly
Also Mentioned on This Page
Usteula Recuord
Osceola
Nebr
A Record Publishing Company (Incorporated
Robert G. Douglas
John A. C. Johnston
James H. Mickey
John F. Ayres
Sec
Treas
Wee Eee
Meee Eee Ewans
Cigan
Hague
China
British Empire
Karl Marx
Nicholas Lenine
John B. Knox
Anniston
Mr. Knox
USS
League of These Nations
Germany
Paris
Fiume
Saar
Danzig
Silesia
Asia
Senaor
Epheo
Ack
Sprague
Carson Aute Co
Osceola Bank
Willis
Beny
Vira
C. G. Timm
The
Colors
Lincoln Telephone and Telegraph Company
Polk
Overland Tire and Rubber Company OF
Omaha
Nebrask
Butle
Alrc
Peter W. Dericks
Rising Orry
Rat