British and American Anti Tobacco Campaigns Compared
A dissect of Britain and the United States amid efforts to curb smoking. The US government acts slowly while private leagues guide most actions. Tobacco firms fund research and oppose warning labels even as they sponsor studies and a major grant to the AMA for smoking disease research.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Britain
American Medical Assn
Tobacco Ad Ban Amid Global Health Campaign Noted
The article notes the Tobacco Research Council funding of grants totaling 745 million to date and contrasts government actions. It cites England’s August 1 television cigarette ad ban and Johnson’s health warning bill, affecting private ITV network income and the BBC without ads.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Council For Tobacco Research
Tobacco Industey Research Committee
England
Johnson
Britain
Ing
Independent Television
Autrerits
Tobacco Warning Laws Comparisons Across Nations
The piece contrasts British and US actions on smoking warnings and advertising bans. It notes UK plans to curb cigarette use and possible ad restrictions, while US voters see the labeling bill as limiting stronger warnings. Critics argue the laws shift health protection versus industry interests as smoking remains on the rise in both nations.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
England
Somce
Labor
Federal Trade Commission
Public Health Service
FTC
PHS
New York State
Also Mentioned on This Page
U. S
nSmoke
Royal College of the
Luther
Terry Sentbel
the News
Frederick
Waryland
Ener ‘N Post
Acrilan
India
Madras
Banchcraft
Lady Towncraft
US Department of Agriculture
Real Colege of Physicians
NEAT
festinghouse—Bendix
Maytag
Norge
Kenmere—Whiripoel GE Frigidaire
Ketvinater
Spe Queen and Hotpoint
Market Street
Montgomers Co
Yenotone
Hagerstown
Hagerstown, Md
A.ef
Cline West Wilson Bird