This is just the beginning! Our collection holds over 300 years of history, including rare newspapers, obituaries, marriage records, birth records, and so much more—most of which you won’t find anywhere else!
This newspaper page contains 48 articles. Subscribers can read the full text of each article.
Newspaper
New York Times
Location
New York, New York, United States of America
Date
Jun 01, 1915
Page
4
An American Press compilation surveys editorials from twenty five cities on the German response to President Wilson's Lusitania note. It concludes von Jagow and advisers miss the core demand and use petty considerations to gain time, urging a direct humane legal answer and recall to accountability.
A compendium of editorials from The Evening Post The Evening Sun The Globe The Evening Man The Evening Telegram The Evening World The Brooklyn Eagle The Sun The Journal of Commerce The American urges clear, direct replies from Germany to President Wilson on submarine warfare and the Lusitania incident. It argues for firm adherence to international law.
A Mobile Register editorial argues President Wilson will not negotiate on a matter he has already decided on, stating any idea of concession contradicts his fixed position after sending a note to Germany.
From The Fresno Republican and The Sacramento Bee a note on Germany’s evasive reply to President Wilson. The papers urge Wilson to press for a definite answer and report the government’s use of delay tactics in diplomacy.
Citizens expect President Wilson to uphold the declaration that the American Government will hold the Imperial Government to strict accountability following the American note to Germany.
The note will displease those pushing Wilson toward a war declaration but will ease fears that Germany, pressed by active enemies, might discard friendship considerations and act recklessly.
From the American note to Germany a demand is stated to abandon blockades by the only instrument and method possible for success. The German reply suggests there is some hope Germany will consent to such an abandonment.
The Des Moines Tribune weighs competing claims on the Lusitania. If Germany is right that the liner carried arms and soldiers in violation of non belligerent rules, the situation differs from the English view that it was engaged in lawful commerce. A careful determination of the ship’s exact status is urged.
The Topeka Capital argues that demands on the Lusitania will be unsatisfactory to the country yet notes the critical situation requires restraint from the public and government. It urges Mr. Wilson and his Cabinet to exhibit good citizenship and avoid hasty calls for action. The paper suggests other government measures may be more effective than war.
The Waterbury Republican notes Germany seeks to dodge the issue and has failed to provide a manly answer, even to the humanitarian portion of the demand.
The German reply delays reparation in the Lusitania and Gulfight cases. The nation trusts President Wilson will vigorously press for the reparations to which we are entitled.
The Louisville papers urge the United States to compel Germany to honor neutral rights or face decisive action. They warn that delay is unacceptable and that the president must secure protections for American lives, using full force if necessary.
The Minneapolis Journal reports the German note as a quibble about minor details. It notes Berlin gave no new response beyond its initial statement after the Lusitania tragedy and says the lack of reply to Wilson’s demand is astounding and disappointing.
The article asserts firm stance on Germany’s compliance with law and an immediate end to hostile actions toward the United States. It stresses refusal to permit delays or excuses and calls for unwavering enforcement of policy and consequences for noncompliance.
The St. Louis Republic remarks that the German note tramples international law and American rights on the seas and dismisses the higher law of universal moral restraint, stating Thou shalt not kill.
The Jacksonville Metropolis asserts German replies are weak and evasive, offering no real answer. It says the German response clarifies and confirms the American position, leaving the United States more confident in its ground.
Several Georgia newspapers criticize Germany's response to the Lusitania note as unsatisfactory and failing to address core issues. The Savannah papers call it evasive and not in line with American demands, while The Atlanta journals insist upon a firm stance and positive action.
A brief Helena newspaper note laments Germany avoiding a decisive issue, insisting the problem remains plain while Berlin dodges confrontation. The report portrays Germany’s reluctance to face the matter directly and precludes an immediate resolution.
The Omaha World-Herald reports a delicate and precarious situation unfolding, with officials weighing risks and potential outcomes as events develop. Details remain guarded, but the paper underscores the seriousness and uncertainty surrounding the matter.
The New Orleans States notes Germany’s lack of tactful statesmanship as she meets the American protest with evasive, unworthy replies, refusing to acknowledge the merciless slaughter.
The Augusta Journal notes Germany’s reply convicts her of gambling with the friendship of several nations rather than risking success in accusing the Lusitania of arming. It forecasts the next move as ours and, citing President Wilson’s May 18 ground, expects a Washington note soon.
The Union argues the United States must enter the European maelstrom if peace terms require it, warning that national honor and dignity depend on decisive action. It claims the country is the sole neutral power with future commercial gains and must sacrifice current advantages to safeguard honor.
The Philadelphia Press calls Germany's reply to the Lusitania note unsatisfactory and vows that its attitude will make maintaining friendly relations with Germany difficult. The Philadelphia Bulletin similarly condemns the evasion and dilatory intent, testing the temper of the American people.
The Pittsburgh Gazette Times states that the lives and rights of American citizens cannot be viewed as conditional on readjusting war conditions to meet Germany's needs, urging independence of rights from diplomatic concessions.
The German reply to the American note is a polite yet firm notification to the United States that if Wilson's contentions are framed as a demand, Germany will issue an emphatic negative response. The report frames the exchange as a cautious, formal diplomatic stance from Berlin.
The Memphis News-Scimitar reports Germany’s note as disappointing yet not wholly unexpected. Berlin raises an issue of fact hoping to suspend the flow of events and gain time for discussion.
The Dallas Times-Herald notes Germany’s stance is not welcome to American ears yet emphasizes that the American public should remain calm and supportive of the President during the evolving international situation. The piece urges unity amid diplomatic tensions.
The fragment expresses skepticism about credibility and challenges arguments, implying a defensive stance toward contested statements and why the speaker’s position should be trusted. It signals a critical view of reasoning offered in the prior discussion.
The Richmond Times Leader urges a prompt response to the German note demanding action over argument. The piece stresses firm diplomatic stance and clear expectations for concrete steps.
The German note is not pitched for American ears and shuns frank discussion. It seeks refuge in questioning facts claimed by President Wilson, avoiding direct confrontation and restricting clarity.
The Imperial Government defends its war policy as a sacred duty, framing it as a duty reaffirmed by President Wilson’s fortnight axe, now seen as sacred and imperative. The Tacoma News notes Germany’s stance and, from our view, its note is valid yet a neutralist may call it evasive and misses the point.
The German preliminary reply seeks to begin discussions while avoiding the impression of closing the door to arrangements that protect neutrals and retain Germany's right to use all means to counter Britain's naval supremacy. The Milwaukee News doubts its good faith, calling it an attempt to buy time in the Lusitania case.
The Springfield State Journal reports President Wilson’s note to Germany inviting discussion of American demands. Germany reportedly accepts the invitation and broadens the debate to Japanese limits, signaling diplomacy could frame the dispute as the Lusitania crisis lingers into the war’s end.
The Baltimore News summarizes a new stance on national security noting reduced fear of near war despite Germany's response to the U.S. note sent to Berlin. The piece frames public mood as calmer than at any prior moment since the diplomatic exchange began.
The Albany Argus states the German response is conciliatory yet guarded evasive and indefinite as to the main issue and serves only as an ad interim note.
The Galveston Tribune notes the German communication deepens concern as it appears to dodge a clear decision and muddies the dispute with quibbling, compounding a previously grave situation.
The Boston Transcript remarks that the German note shows an insulting attitude toward the United States by implying the nation is not a power demanding prompt consideration. It stresses disappointment at the tone and calls out the implied snub in diplomatic exchange.
The Rochester Democrat and Chronicle notes that the profession of regret is hollow given the wholesale murder of Lusitania occupants. It describes the act as a deliberate, premeditated violation of humane law and honorable warfare, accusing the reply of evasion and subterfuge.
The Paso Herald reports Germany’s reply does not address a single point in the American note and ignores key concerns raised by the United States, signaling a continued diplomatic stalemate.
The Cheyenne Tribune notes broad public support for the President during the crisis and predicts continued backing for any further actions that may be required.
From The Hoston Journal, it seems the President’s proposal will not likely satisfy his advisers or the American public. The piece casts doubt on whether the administration can secure broad approval.
The Chicago Daily News reports that the German reply to a diplomatic move does not meet plausibility standards, remaining blunt and noncommittal. The piece notes limited willingness to engage and hints at a stalled negotiation tone.
The Detroit Journal notes that despite disagreements the country must avoid despair and work toward a final agreement with Germany. The editorial frames the topic as essential for peace and stability amid ongoing diplomatic talks.
The Columbus Dispatch notes the German response is courteous yet reveals a spirit of Deutschland Ueber Alles beneath the surface. It invites discussion of core facts but gives no assurance Germany will provide the guarantees President Wilson seeks in humanity’s name.
The Cleveland Plain Dealer reports Germany’s note is distinctly unsatisfactory and its shiftiness has increased resentment. The article contrasts with The Cleveland Leader noting President Wilson cannot let the case heat up further.
A promotional folder details 42 popular California Exposition routes with maps for quick planning. It lists hotels and boarding houses in California with rates, and promotes low round trip fares from New York. The Rock Island Travel Bureau provides folders and booklets with ticket options including the Golden State Limited and Colorado line.
June 1 reports from London newspapers publish the text of Germanys reply to the American note and Herre von Jagows interview. Washington correspondents call the situation very serious and warn rupture of diplomatic relations may not be far distant, though The Times notes the President may offer one more chance.
Ohio May 41. The Sie benberger Sachsen Society national convention adopts resolutions condemning Administration policy on the European war. It declares the United States should be strictly neutral but unanimously pledges America first, first and always.
We want people to find what they are looking for at NewspaperArchive. We are confident that we have the newspapers that will increase the value of your family history or other historical research. With our 7-day free trial, you can view the documents you find for free.
People find the most success using advanced search. Try plugging in keywords, names, dates, and locations, and get matched with results from the entire collection of newspapers at NewspaperArchive!
You can also successfully find newspapers by these browse options. Explore our archives on your own!
Browse by location and discover newspapers from all across the world.
Browse by date and find publications for a specific day or era.
Browse old newspaper publications to find specific newspapers.