Editorial notes reveal a partisan, and scattered, political panorama
A dense column of 19th century editorials discusses Republican sentiments, Porter bill debates, Alaska governance, tariff proposals, and political intrigues. It critiques Congress for inaction on trade dollars, cites open questions about election outrages in the South, and notes financial themes from British holdings to Irish fundraising.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Sloctm
Fitz John Porter
House
Congress
Porter
Supreme Court limits Union Pacific mail subsidy stance
The Supreme Court ruled Union Pacific not bound by postmaster general’s award for mail transport and eligible for air remuneration only up to private line rates. Congress may seek laws to withhold government funds from subsidized roads to cover bond interest, as debt arrears and interest obligations loom large.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
United States Supreme Court
Union Pasifia
Postimaatar
Supreme Court
Congress
Philanthropist or pirate in sheep’s clothing tale
A critical sketch portrays Willard as a concealed prayerful investor who lost fortune while pursuing European and American uplift via railways. The piece lambasts him as a hypocritical philanthropist turned rich-poor map, equating philanthropy with piracy and warning others against rash railway ventures.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Henry Villard
Northern Pacific Railway Company
Villard
Northern Pacific Preferred
Oregon Transcontinental and
Oregon Railway
Ganial
Gould
Vanderbilt
Jay Gould
Villard Agen
Reilrond
Wall Street
Wall
Pacific
Europe
America
Oregon
Willard
Napoleon
St. Helena
Fifth Avenue
Indefinite Philanthropy and Free Trade Critique
The free traders concede protection benefits for local or state welfare yet claim free trade serves the world. The United States seeks a policy favoring its own markets and industry growth, not global welfare. Indefinite philanthropy, like world-spanning free trade, benefits no single people or nation.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Flint Globe
Michigan
United States
Farmers and the Tariff in 19th Century Debate
From the Cleveland Lauder the article argues against free trade, citing 1833 and 1846 tariffs and the 1840s farmer hardships. It contrasts free trade with protection, presenting figures on wheat, salt, cotton, iron, and other goods to claim protection benefited farmers and the economy.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Cleveland Lauder
Ohio
Missouri
Hannibal Journal
Pike County
Biomare
Liverpool
Stricul
Also Mentioned on This Page
Mistaaut
Mica
Seth Lewin
Seth. Lewis
wiLt B. Lewis
Ekroutor
Marshall, Mich
Faray Evenine
Warmsaton
D. C
Chicago
Haman
Epparata
District of Columbia
National Committee
D. M. Babin
Minnesota
John A. Martin
Kansne
Republican National Committee
Tere
Edmunds
Lincoln
Harr
Senate
Alaska
North Pole
Morrison
Illinois
Bourbon
Sherman
Mahone
South
Manx Twais
Adam
Mark
Eve
Rothachilds
Burdett-Coutts
England
Brie
Bouth Caroling
Inscope
Laman
Goslow
Simon
Parnell
Ireland
Irish National League of New York
St. Patrick
Frelinguuysen
O'Donnell
Finerty, Robinson, Dynamite & Co
Grand Army of the Republic
Dudley
Massachusetts
Ben Butler
Tewksbury
Massa
van Riper
New York
Lewis
John RB
Bentley
Wim, B. Chugh
Retical Directo
Marselatii
Mutual Aid Association
Braver Black
Galvin
Campbell
Royal Organ
Chickering
HALE
Haines Bros
Campbell & Gillett
Tohanzen
D. M. Stewwn
Ywouvu Evver
A. Walis Warehouse
West State Street
THE
Marshall Gas CO
Gas Works
Hamilton St
Gas Co
Constan
Aiuatgante
Hye
This is just the beginning! Our collection holds over 300 years of history, including rare newspapers, obituaries, marriage records, birth records, and so much more—most of which you won’t find anywhere else!