McLeod's Case Explored in New York Express
The New York Express analyzes McLeod's Case, arguing misinterpretations in Britain and America. It contends that Caroline’s destruction was by an individual, not a national act, and that U S law preserves state sovereignty and individual liability. It stresses piracy laws, territorial jurisdiction, and the need for extradition treaties rather than fiat by foreign powers.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Great Britain
United States
Wattell
Caroline
High Seas
Lake Erie
New York
England
McLeod
N. York State
Canada
Jackson
Florida
The
McBeod
State of
Wa Etuer
Difference between rich and poor shown by money in pocket
A proverb-like line notes that the gap between wealthier and poorer individuals arises from finances, not inherent character, highlighting the role of money in fate and opportunity.
Proscription and patronage in Whig vs. Loco Foco politics
In a dense critique, the author argues the Administration’s patronage shifts cancel proscription myths by sharing offices with Whigs. He recalls Jackson and Van Buren purges, contends Whigs would not abandon anti proscription principles, and asserts rightful restoration of government offices to their original pattern while marking and removing profligate office holders.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Themelves
Boyhoad
Frederick
James Melton
Madame de la Tour
Frederic de la Tour
Tom de la Tour
Pred- Cite
Frederic
Poliely
Mangor
Mel
Jackson
Gen
Harrison
Mr. van Buren
Congress
U.S
New Jersey
Barbour
Eiverybody
van Buren
Republic
Also Mentioned on This Page
Gore
May
Pliny Earle
Isle of Heavenly Rest
Civen
M. de la Tour
France
Lyons
Paris
Iere
Travye
James
Fredericks
Sir James
New York Express