Statecraft and the limits of executive explanations
Excerpted correspondence discusses the President’s communications with Congress and foreign governments, arguing that no foreign power has a right to demand explanations of executive actions. It defends the President’s messages as candid and necessary, refuting claims of improper motives and urging independence from foreign interference.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
United States
Duc de Broglie
U. S
Paris
Wajesty
Clare
Ics
Tsures
Congress
U. States
Europe
Courts of Justice
France
Affairs of
Washington
Hieney
Jme
Mesers Marshall
Gerry & Pinckney
Prince Polignac
Mr Rives
Rives
Messise
Riih
Liam
M-de Rigny
M. Serrurier
Tsay
Tfis
Lishould
America
England
Berlin
Milan
Great Britain
Altho
Brance
Senate of
Senate
Hoth
Magasty
Jtig
Tle
Also Mentioned on This Page
Rintld
Pullisued
A. Preston.e