Carolina Doctrine and the Embargo Debate in New England
A staunch defense of the federal balance opposes state interference in federal law. The speaker argues New England would not sever the Union over the embargo, urging reliance on constitutional tribunals to decide disputes and insisting the general government, not state legislatures, holds ultimate authority. He refutes the Carolina doctrine as ungrounded.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
England
New England
Tts
Congress
Tillhouse
Connecticut
Washington
New Roeland
New Boutland
Carolina
Unio
Massachusetts
Virginia
South Carolina
Theentleman
Massachuseotts
The
United States
Uur
Jadio Tibunals
Vick
Samuael Dexter
Union of the States
Dexter
Thave
Tle
Tie
New Zingland
South
Wwe
Fingland
Chase
Jennsylvan
Jooks
Wil Fink Ak Sak
South Carona
Pennsylvania
S. Carolina
Mr. Madison
Madison
Blates
Ace
Mascacuctls
Polony
Lius
Senate
House of Representatives
Lander
Confederacy
Stes Congress
U. States
Supreme Court
Sam
Junion