Justus v Rosner attorneys fight over fees in malprac case
In Henderson County a long running medical malpractice dispute between Justus and Rosner returns to court over attorney fees and Pamela Justus's reduced 512000 award. Plaintiffs attorney Wade Byrd seeks to strike a mitigation question affecting the damages, arguing for full compensation for the family while Rosner's lawyer contends the request is improper under Rule 59. The trial followed a seven week case that concluded with a negligent finding against Rosner and an award trimmed to a fraction of the original amount.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Lightning
Henderson County
Byrd
Rosner
Scott Stevenson
Charlotte
Supreme Court
Stevenson
Guice
Also Mentioned on This Page
Justus v. Rosner
Eeesad Acto de
Pam Justus
Billy
Bill Moss
Hendersonville Lightning
Wade Byrd
CNV
Ereema
Hendersonville Country Club
Ore Lake
First Citizens Bank
Lake Pointe Landing
TD Bank
WHKP
Altavista Wealth Management, Inc
Thos. Shepherd & Son Funeral Directors
WTZQ
Tom and Sue Fazio
WNC Magazine
Boyd Chevrolet Cadillac
Buick
Bold Life
Hilliard Lyons
Suzanne Holbert
CPA/PFS-Dixon Hughes Goodman Wealth Advisors LLC
Pardee Hospital Foundation
Morrow Insurance Agency, Inc
Times-News
the van Wink
Ergamea
Oeana Et