This is just the beginning! Our collection holds over 300 years of history, including rare newspapers, obituaries, marriage records, birth records, and so much more—most of which you won’t find anywhere else!
Supreme Court study argues against new national appeals court
A NYU Law Review analysis by John Sexton and Samuel Estreicher argues the Supreme Court wastes time on unworthy cases and would gain by reforming case selection rather than creating a new court. It urges allowing issues to percolate in lower courts and focusing on cases needing immediate action. The study calls the court an overall manager of a legal system.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Los Angeles Times
Washington
Supreme Court
Appeals Court
Warren E. Burger
New York University Law Review
NYU Law
John Sexton
Samuel Estreicher