Letter on Martin Luther movie prompts strong views
Nathaniel G. Herreshoff defends the 1953 film Martin Luther, arguing Luther’s bravery, condemning the “outraged” critic, and detailing historical points from 1505 to 1519. He notes the film’s accuracy on indulgences and Tetzel, praises its reception in Detroit, and ends the series with editor’s note.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
University of Michigan
Phoenix
Martin Luther
Detroit
Ger‘ian
Peritson
Uluti
Sam
Martin
Luther
Worms
Rome
Johann Tetzel
Mainz
Leo X
St Peter’s
House of Fugg
Fugge
St Peter's
Vatican
Krim Theatre
Jesus Christ
Nathaniel G. Herreshoff
Also Mentioned on This Page
Sto? Gall
Brest
Cea
Water Street
Warren
Prenda’s
Bristol
Turkeys
S. J. Steen
Hope Street
Laird C. Robinson
Sunnyside Farm
Metacom Ave
R. I. Conn
Grote Andrade
Bay View Ave
Kinder
Holly
Gall
ALRVA
la Fazias
Phe
Meri
John Lafazix
Ohio
Pages & Shaw
Paris
Gillette