How the Farmer Fares The Heavy Burden Imposed by War Taxes
A historical survey details how farmers cope with wartime taxes, outlining increased levies, shifting costs, and the impact on crop prices and rural livelihoods. It highlights county agents, farm organizations, and market responses shaping farmer resilience.
Massachusetts Farmers Face Harsh Tariff Truths
A Massachusetts perspective argues that high war taxes persist after 1865, harming farmers who must pay duties on staple goods. It contests protectionist theory, noting minimal benefit to New England agriculture while consumers shoulder higher prices and local industry profits rise for mills and factories. The piece calls for tariff reform to expand exchange with distant markets and reduce living costs.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
United States
America
Massachusetts
Pennsylvania
Michigan
Florida
Dakota
California
Old Bay State
Canada
Mexico
China
England
Congress
New England
New York
West Indies
Washington
Massachusets
Common Sense
West
Lawrence
New Bedford
Fall River
North Adams
Chicopee
Worcester
Fitchburg
Maynard
Lowell
Pittsfield
Lynn
Brockton
Holyoke
Dalton and Lee
Boston
Cape Cod
Franklin
Commonwealth
Northampton
Danvers
Montreal
London
State Board of Agriculture
J.S. Fay
Barnstable Agricultural Society
Mr. Fay
Providence
Tariff talk from Congressman Russell on farming and industry
Washington notes quote Congressman John E. Russell defending tariff reform and its impact on farmers in the tenth district. He argues farmers are taxed across goods from salt to lumber, cites home market limits, and warns against retaliatory duties while praising free wool and the need to improve meat production and mutton quality for better farm profits.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Washington
Sprcrat
John E. Russell
Massachusetts
Wright
Mr. Russell
Lord Brougham
George IV
Caroline
United States
Liverpool
Gloucester
Congress
New York Tribune
Will
Ways and Means
Russell
Senate
England
France
Germany
New England
Southwest
California
Protection-Free Wool Views Show Tariff Risks for Farmers
Congressman Burnett said the current tariff harms farmers and urged more relief such as free raw materials and targeted duties on hay barley eggs poultry potatoes and vegetables. He argued farmers subsidize industry yet receive little compensating benefit, noting wage discrepancies and varying impacts by location.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Burnett
Wasumoron
Sprovar
The Protected Manufacturer and the Unprotected Farmer
The Hon. George B. Loring argues tariff policy shifts tax from consumers to foreign producers. The piece questions protectionists claims about tariff benefits to farmers, noting Massachusetts manufacturing capital growth and farm land gains, and asking why farmers have not shared prosperity.
Practical points from a Tramp Trip and a coat tale
The narrator describes paying 16 dollars for a London Melton overcoat and a New York driver paying 18 dollars. He argues that European poverty stems from concentrated wealth, not free trade, and criticizes protectionists who claim tariffs raise wages while noting European countries with low protection have higher wages. He suggests free trade is misunderstood and Europe lacks true free trade.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Europe
Lee Memwelier
London
Melton
America
New York
Third Avenue
Gladstone on American protection and world markets
From Gladstone's Leeds speech of 1881, he argues America's protectionist system limits its global exports while the UK maintains commercial primacy. He contrasts American export volumes to Asia, Africa, and Australasia with Britain's far larger shipments, urging continued free trade and warning against protective errors.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Europe
England
America
Italy
Germany
Russia
Asia
Africa
Australasia
United States
United Kingdom
Americas
Gladstone
Leeds
Eng
How the Steel Rail Manufacturers Protect American Labor
The piece argues that steel rail makers used patent rights and tariffs to force domestic purchases by large rail customers. It notes Pacific railroad charters were conditioned on buying American iron and steel, while domestic producers imported foreign pig iron scrap and ore. It cites foreign ore imports in 1880 totaling 493,408 tons and old rails worth about $14.7 million, highlighting contrasts in supposed national labor protection.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Congress
Pacific
Iron and Steel Friends
Europe
Spain
Englan
David A. Wells
Mr Blaine Wants Free Lumber
A historical speech excerpt argues against taxation of breadstuffs and lumber, highlighting wartime measures, protectionism, and tariff tricks. It notes lumber use for daily life and criticizes attempts to dodge duties with damaged goods, citing Congressman James G Blaine and later tariff evasion tactics by button makers and cloth suppliers.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Congress
Chicago
Toledo
Milwaukee
Ohio
James G. Blaine
House of Representatives
Button tariffs and hypocrisy in Massachusetts factory town
The writer accuses protectionists of avoiding tariffs while imposing them on others. He cites Samuel Williston and partners in Easthampton Massachusetts who allegedly benefited from a heavy protective tax on domestic buttons to curb foreign competition. He argues such taxes are secured through personal influence on the Ways and Means Committee.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Senate
Michigan
Wisconsin
Elswhere
Chicago Tribune
Horace Greeley
Blaine
Sherman
Ohio
Mr. Willistom and Company
Custom House
A. L. Perry
Samuel Williston
Easthampton
Mass
Massachusetts
Customs Service
United States
Committee of Ways and Means
Protective Sand Bars and Trade Policy Critique
The piece argues that protectionist policies swing from gains in lower freights to renewed calls for tariffs as soon as costs fall. It likens repeated patches of policy to a man mending clothing with scraps, leaving a rag in the end, and critiques dredging, navigation acts, and subsidies as costly cycles. It cites Professor W. G. Sumnen.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Ike
Professor W. G. Sumnen
Garden Sauce Theory of Political Economy
The article argues protection builds a local market for farm products but the gain comes from proximity to towns, not protection itself. It questions spreading towns near every farm and warns that vast lands would remain uncultivated. Manufacturing grows around strong centers, not per farm fortifications.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
W. M. Grosvenor
N. ¥. Tribune
Free trade debate echoed in Garfield 1870 speech
Quoted remark ties lam to protection and free trade. Garfield states modern scholarship supports free trade in a House of Representatives address dated April 1, 1870. The snippet reflects 19th century economic argument and legislative context.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
James A. Garfield
House of Representatives
Also Mentioned on This Page
Treasury
Barnstable
Berkshire
Mia
Gescosevsreee
Eeesee
Seereee
Cccceensesseee
Ingrain
Brussels
Castile
Congressman Russell
George B. Loring
New England Agricultural Society
Arthur
Cleveland
Folger
McCulloch
Manning
Fairchild
Dr. Loring
MR. Blaine