Unmaking a President Part VIII recounts Watergate strain
The piece traces Washington’s legal clash over White House tapes, noting President Nixon’s July 26 refusal to respond to subpoenas and the ensuing four way power struggle among the President Congress courts and the special prosecutor. It highlights Judge Sirica’s Oct 17 ruling and shifts to the Cox suit as Haldeman testifies and Wright weighs in on taped conversations.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
John Marshall
United States v
Burr
Washington
Montesquieu
Bentham
Locke
Brady
Maryland
Marbury
Madison
White House
Congress
Sirica
Separation of Powers
Executive
H.R. Haldeman
Watergate Committee
Charles Alan Wright
Grand Jury
Buzhardt
Cox
Court of Appeals
Sirica Rules On Nixon Tapes In Landmark Exec Privilege Fight
The Watergate tapes dispute moves through Chief Judge Sirica and the courts. The article details June 1972 meetings, Mitchell and Haldeman talks, and the push to compel disclosure, with Cox and Wright clashing over executive privilege. The DC Circuit orders the tapes to Sirica for in chamber review while preserving possible privilege and hints at Supreme Court involvement. Sirica’s stance anchors a pivotal legal battle affirming the rule that the President is not above the law.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Ziegler
Dean
Haldeman
Ehrlichman
Mitchell
Sirica
Wright
Cox
Texas
Henry de Bracton
Judge Sirica
Also Mentioned on This Page
J. Anthony Lukas
N.Y
Nixon
CREEP
John
Watergate
John Sirica
Bernard Barker
Justice Department
Joseph L. Rauh
Americans For Democratic Action
Sirca
Jack Dempsey
United States
Supreme Court
Wight
District of Columbia
Moses
Hammurabi
Solon
Justinian
Armstrong Floor
Armstrong
Ourtame. Furniture Inc
Elm ST
Bennington
Vermont
Bisevreka
H.P Motor
Ermont
Best Buy
Cy Bluto
Appliance Center Inc
Main St
Heritage House
Ries, Cole Slaw
Northside Drive
Bank Americard
House of Walsh
Spring Street
Williamstown
Mass
George Krawcyzk
Evans News Inc