Debates Over Embargo Policy and War Costs
A Federal debate contends with embargo as security and retaliation. Speakers praise peace and condemn mercantile interests while weighing war with France and Britain. Naval dispatches, parliamentary votes, and regional responses outline the embargo’s impact and public sentiment in 1808 Georgia and New England.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
France
England
New-England
Virginia
Smiths
Grays
Crowniathields
Aris
Massachusetts
America
Massachusects
Anderton
Medford
Britain
N. York
Spain
Portugal
Sevilla
Feme Jauta
Seville
Napoleon
United States
Great Britain
U. States
Rllea (T
Taggart
Gardenier
Randolph
Georgia
Milledgeviler
Dee
U. S
U. Scates
U. Sistes
Congrese Lawir
Georgia Argut
Augusta Chronicle
Republican Intelligencer
Savannah
Charley Abercrombie
Foreman
Jame Barrow
Francis Boyking
Joan Howard
John Scott
William Jones
Tillman Dixon
Robert Raines
Leroy Pope
Jett Thomas
Thaddeus Holt
Joel M.clerdon
John M.kenzie
Bolting Hall
William, Rabin
Zachariah Lamar
R. A. Blent
Flugh M. Comer
Philip L. Sims
Johnn W. Devereux
Johnson
Saall Appar
Also Mentioned on This Page
Foreign Intelligence
London
Ocober
Mr. Shaw
Chessenger
Erfurt
Dover
Calais
Paris
Bonaparte
Shaw
Europe
Charless Cotton
Harry Burrard
Portsmouth
ST. Andero
Vittoria
Leith
Sandwich
Tybee
Naflae
Foley
Armistead
Corps
Cepreid Froufton
A. B. Armistead
Canz
Ift Reg
U. S. Arcillerists
Court of Admiralty of
Distrig of
Jas. Wallace
B. Armifteld
U. S. Artillerist
Groxneia
Chatham County
Thomas Cumming
William Royton
M. Brown
William Roberts
John Filis
John Pettibone
Archor
Tos
A&s Ah
Columbia County Academy
Theseia Society
Library Company of
Augusta
Laurens
Louisvile
Academy of
Louisville
Christ Chorch
Monticello
Laboor House and Hospital Society