Reasons Against the Late Convention's Proposed Constitution
A Georgia pamphlet argues four reasons to oppose the convention reforms. It claims the plan freezes minority power, up to 62 counties gaining 62 seats while 62 others receive 70, creating unequal representation and potential minority control of laws, Senate elections, and judges. It condemns the remedy as not addressing the core inequity and details disparities in population-to-representative ratios across counties.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Waite
Congress
Ufe
Bor
Zod
J. M. Nielon
Camden
J. Bishop
Bishopville
Salem
Sumter
Camden Journal
Is the slave representation tax plan right for the people
A polemic argues against ratification of a constitutional measure altering representation and taxation. It contends the proposed tax reduction primarily benefits the rich and slaveholding counties, not the poor, and warns that removing slave-based representation would raise taxes on all, harming the majority. The piece defends equal stakes between rich and poor and urges unity.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Paiely
Controversy on Georgia Secrecy and Southern Union Views
The piece mocks critics of Mr. McDuffie of South Carolina visiting Athens and condemns efforts to bar non residents from Georgia's literary circles. It argues for travel rights, warns against Calhounist alliances, and urges a Southern Convention to address secession, tariffs, and federal power. It also critiques the Colonization Society and its American agents in England as duplicitous.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Upson
Meny
Athens
McDuffie
South Carolina
Hardihood
Ulura
Georgia
Federal Union
McDuifie
McDuffrie
Savannah
Hamilton
Calhoun
Union
Debate on war like hostility and Crawford's nullification views
In sharp editorial tone the piece rebukes hostile attacks and defends Major Crawford against nullification criticisms. It argues Unionist patience, insists on constitutional State Rights positions, and supports Crawford's consistent interpretation amid emergency.
The Colonization Society and its Abolitionist Critics
The article argues that distinguished Liver pool merchants contend the Colonization Society is an emancipation front in effect and names charges by Abolition Society agents. It accuses agents of double standards and Jesuitlike ends justify means, claiming money drives corrupt contracts between societies and agents.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
London
New York
England
Colonization Society
South
Hogland
Peorte
Liverpool
Abolition Society
Garrison
North
Also Mentioned on This Page
Ron
Avovera Chronicle
Miss Dan
BrRox
Tinotheus
Sue
Menandor
Lombardy
Xeose
Seolland
Liberty
Carolina
Carolus
Shien City
Mureh
Hall
John Randolph
U. S
My. WeDullie
Major Crawford
Mlegor Crawford
Swale Notes
D. Keers
J.B. St. John & Co
Allatooney Hotel
PRM
Allatooney Gold Mines
Cass County
Allatooney
Carroll Mines
Auraria
Lumpkin County
Columbia
Columbia Court Y House
Monroe County
Josiah Jones
Columbia County
Whitcomb
Isaac Downie
Troup County
Lee County
David Cooper
Early County
Joseph Cooper
Qakloebna
Rabun County
William Brown
Dooly County
Bowling W. Stark
Jackson County
William Stark
B. W. Stark
Muccoee County
Joan Collins
Vr. c. C.c
Inferior Court
Burke County
Waynes
Fielding Fryer
Fielding Stephens
Joseph D. Thomas
Hary Coyough
Murry
Ville
Hall County
John Marshall
Chronicle and Courier
Standard of Union
Sparte Federal Union and Journal
Milledgeville
Southern Banner
Athers
Wester Merald
Washington News
Augusta
ILM
Augusta City
Albert W. Jones
John Banks
William G. Grimes
E. B. Glascock
Matthew Nelson
Cumming
Commission Werehant
Advan
Seru Yan
Bussiness En Fugusia
A. Stacehn
Edgefield
Verchants
John Warsezale
NILE
Planta Lion
Wilkes County
Washington
Greer
Madison, &c
Jackson and
Reynolds Streets
Dr. Ford
Jackson Street
J. P. Seize
Albo
Jackson
Force