Debates on Slavery and Insurrection in Virginia 1831-1833
A polemical critique argues slavery nurtures liberty by equality among whites, warns against insurrection, and cites Virginia and Caribbean precedents. It discusses population growth, police, and the dangers of emancipation and fanaticism, urging lawful restraint and union preservation.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Virginia
Thomas KR. Daw
William and Mary College
Greece
Rome
Sparta
Burke
Jack Cade
United States
West Indies
Edwards
Europe
Tasarreelions
Reilly
WU Fotlow
Ley Beyin
Nat
T'Ravis
Coul
Will
Imine
St. Domiingo
Society of the Anis Des Noirs
The
Friends of the Blacks
Paris
Africa
Gold Coast
Brunce
South
Iurstage
London
Sulieet
Whdee
Tate
Jamaica
South America
Old Dominion
Clay
Babylon
Lizrel Lateri
Mgr. Gibbon
Lord Wellington
Louis Philip
Italy
France
Germany
Russia
Popular Party
Elance Pu Fnsi Perulte
Brazil
West India Islands
South Carolina
Louisiana
Free States
Brown
Marshall
Olines
Qanals
Washington
National Intelligencer
Woasamoton City
North American Review
Union
Georgia Interests Clash Over Internal Improvement Plan
A republication of a Georgia letter argues for internal improvement but warns against schemes favoring Savannah at the expense of other ports. It discusses railroads and canals, the August termination link to Charleston, and the risk to Savannah’s commerce and property values. The author urges statewide patriotism and broader benefit, citing export trade and broader regional impacts.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Gap
Georgia
Union
Athens
Eatonton
Caroling
Hamburg
Charleston
Iigs
Savanneh
West
Savannah
Savannah Bel
Also Mentioned on This Page
Review
S. Carolina
Cendor
Southron
Cbace
Courier & Enquires
Great Britain
England
West India
Eveland
Washington Globe
U. States
New School of Philanthropy
St. Domingo
Philadelphia
New York
Boston
Massachusetts
Threnp
Ani
Mmere
Kersha
Sumter
Perday
Keralian
Lancaster
Chartestan Post
Aucey