Deering Binders Put to Test Against McCormick in South
Letters from York County farmers report Deering binders outperforming McCormick machines in field tests. Testimonies from Guthriesville Yorkville Albany and others praise lighter draft easier lever use and superior bundle quality with many noting decisive wins in the Monroe Field Contest.
Deering Best In Harvester Battle Says Yorkville Buggy Co
Yorkville Buggy Co asserts Deering Harvester superior after critical comparisons with McCormick. Proprietor M C Willis explains policy to sell best goods and rebuts McCormick tactics, citing personal inspection and endorsements from customers. They pledge fair treatment and gratitude for patronage while aiming to increase binder sales.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Yorkville
M. C. Wittts
Harvester Company Letter Counters McCormick Ad Campaign
M F Holahan general agent at Atlanta writes to Yorkville Bogey Co about a Yorkville Mequirer clipping on a trial between Motor Mick and Neering Linders at Monroe. He claims a Richmond agency rebuts McCormick accusations and promises testimonials from field contests won in the territory. He asserts McCormick outsold and offers more help if needed.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Yorkville
S. C
Yorkville Mexquirer
Motormick
Richmond General Agency
Huff
McCormick
Charlotte
Deering Harvester CO
M. F. Houawan
Gen
Agt
Deering Harvester Refutes McCormick Field Trial Claim
Richmond office of Deering Harvester reports Monroe field trial on Tuesday the 4th ended without a McCormick victory. McCormick agent Fox refused to recognize Showalter as Deering’s legal representative, a challenge was issued and rejected, Plyler acted as judge amid crowd interest, with Showalter demonstrating the machine and Plyler noting no difference in performance.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
McCormick
Guthriesville
York County
R. S. Fitzpatrick
Deering Company
Deering
Fitzpatrick
J. L. Williamson
Richmond
Deering Harvester Co
Monroe
Weering Binder
RR. Og. Fox
T. T. Showal
Plyler
T Heath-Lee Hardware Co
Letter praises Deering Linder and harvester features
A 1901 letter from Yorkville expresses satisfaction with a Deering Linder horse machine praised for simple right-hand levers and easy operation. The writer extends preference for this truck model over a folding platform version, and mentions other dealer correspondence as well.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Yorkville
LL. C
Yorkville Bogey Co
D. C
Witterspoon
Deering Binder Endorsements Boosts Georgia Farmers View
Letters from Georgia farmers in 1900 praise the Deering Ideal Binder over McCormick, citing lighter draft, easier operation, fewer parts, durable construction, ball bearings, and easier twine usage. Signers include H. H. Nelms and WIlburn families among others in Rome, Foster Mills, Pryors, and surrounding towns.
Deering Binders in North Carolina Echoes
A letter from W G Trout praises the Ideal Binder as efficient and labor saving, comparing it to plowing with two hands. He claims it requires two mules to pull, impresses with roller and ball bearings, and urges readers to contact M C Padgett or Trollinger to order.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Albany
Deering Harvester Co
Atlanta
Deering and McCormick
Deering
H. N. Hall
Forest City
N. C
M. C. Padgett
Padgett
Trollinger
W. G. Trout
Cut Last Harvest With Two Small Horses
Forest City North Carolina June 12 1900 M C Padkett Local Agent reports the Ideal Binder performs well for cutting and binding after two seasons of use. The machine is praised as light draft and highly efficient for Rutherford county farmers as a grain and labor saver.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Forest City
N. C
M. C. Padkett
Rutherford County
M. C. Padgett
R. H. Trollinger
M. F. Hopper
Deering Harvester Ad Claims Local Market Lead
A traveling salesman for the Deering Harvester Company touts strong sales in York County and promises to honor all guarantees. He asserts competitors misrepresent the firm and invites readers to read testimonials from “Your Neighbors Say” about Deering Harvesting Machinery.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
York County
Hannah
Ideal Binder praised by farmers and agents in 1900
Letters from Festus Bridges M C Padgett M F Hopper W P Watkins Fay Harrill and Wm McDonald extol the Ideal Deering Binder. They claim it saves grain reduces labor and delivers clean cuts easy draft and consistent tying of bundles. Local agents Trollinger and Padgett cited as reliable distributors.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Padgett
Trollinger
Festus Bridges
Ily
W. P. Watkins
Fay Harrill
Ideal Deering Binder Praised by Forest City Mayor
Forest City, June 14, 1900. City officials certify they witnessed Mr. Wm McDonald’s Ideal Deering Binder start smoothly and perform excellent work cutting and binding. The machine pulled by two mules under 1600 pounds did not miss a bundle, hailed as a reliable hammer by J T Fortune and L A Moore.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Forest City
N. C
Wm. McDonald
J. T. Fortune
L. A. Moore
Also Mentioned on This Page
Messrs
Shannon & Co
I. F. Plyler
Monroe N. C
W. D. Lona
Richmond, Va
Deering Binders
J. Leonidas Moore
J. M. Moore
York
Yorkville Buggy Co
F. CG. Black
G. R. Wallace
Neuman Plaxco
John Plaxco
L. A. Mcgill
Mr. Willis
I. B. Gordon
Voices From
Georgia
Atlanta, Ga
Marietta St
H. H. Nelms
M. F. Hatowan
Mr. Nelms
Office of
Yorkville Buggy Company
M. C. Willis
McCormick Harvester Company
Deering Harvester Company
Virginia
Eral
McCormick Company
M. F. Holahan
Deering Pinders
Younviink
S.C
Deering Harvester
Rome
Sirs
H. W. Wilburn
T.C
Chapman
Foster Mills
J. E. Camp
Chas. A. Wood
Pryors
A. R. Jones
J. B. Wilkerson
Silver Hill
R. L. Horton
Ww. P. Bullen
Brice
Ss. M. Wynn
North Carolina
R. Ss. Fitzpatrick
Deering Ideal
R.H. Trollinger
Mer
McCormick Harvesting Machine Co
Deering Machine
Carolinas
Virginias
Columbia
Co. L. Warfield
Chicago
Illinois
Yorkville, S.C