Gas Rationing and the Carter Congress Debate
A columnist argues that gasoline rationing exists already as oil companies limit supplies and dealers restrict hours. The piece notes Iran’s production drop, OPEC influences, and looming government action while urging motorists to ration themselves rather than face formal state controls.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Carter
Congress
Washington
Mr. Carter
Congress urged to create standby selective service system
The piece urges prompt enactment of peace time registration for draft age men and a standby induction system. It notes current weaknesses in the Selective Service, cites a 110 day mobilization delay, and reports a House subcommittee vote approving next year registration. Congress is urged to act.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Pentagon
Selective Service
Melvin Price
House Armed Services Committee
House Armed Services
House
Senate
Congress
Carter Defends SALT II Amid Senate Criticism
In a forceful response President Carter argues Senate rejection would harm U S image as a warmonger while defenders like Howard Baker face political pressure. He states SALT merits ratification as a long effort by Nixon and the Soviets to curb an arms race and reduce nuclear risk. Polls show public support.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
N.Y. Times News Service
Howard Baker
Carter
Senate
United States
Baker
Hawks
Mr. Carter
Richard Nixon
SALT II debate tests U S trust in arms treaty
The article argues Senate rejection of SALT II risks undermining U S credibility and the bipartisan push for Moscow arms limits. It weighs consequences of amendments, Soviet reactions, and President Carter's stance, warning that changing the treaty could damage trust and weaken deterrence.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Carter
Dobrynin
Senate
Saline solution for SALT II politics and timing
The piece analyzes how the SALT II treaty may move through the U.S. Senate, with Carter’s plan facing delays and amendments. It foresees a drawn out process, Senate linkage to broader US-Soviet relations, and possible postponement until after the 1980 election to avoid weakening negotiations.
Multinationals and the Power Shift in Global Capitalism
In a 1979 New York Times analysis, multinationals challenge state power as Carter focuses on inflation. Oil giants and beverage firms shape policy, subsidies, and competition with governments in France, China, and beyond, while the state declines as a dynamic institution and borders blur.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
N.Y
Carter
Republic
United States
Marx
Jefferson
Mao Zedong
ITT
Chile
NATO
Paar
Secositar
Also Mentioned on This Page
Department of Energy
American Petroleum Institute
Energy Department
Middle East
Iran
OPEC
Roy E. Potts
Lewis H. Ebert
Eugene David
Loomis
Winchester Evening Star
By Tom Wicker
The
Moscow
Soviet Union
J. Edgar Hoover
Vance
William Safire
New York Times
Vienna
Brezhnev
Giscard d’Estaing
U S
White House
Foreign Relations Committee
China
Panama Canal
Torrijos
Paul Warnke
O.K
Jackson
Jerry Brown
Moynihan
U.S
By Russell Baker
Coca- Cola
PepsiCo
Peking
Lenin
France
Ford
Lorraine
Peugeot-Citroen
Renault