Legal Opinion on Jury Inclusion and Civil Rights in North Carolina
WaavicTor North Carolina November 25 1881 P Canaday asks for opinion on jury selection excluding colored citizens. The reply cites the 13th 14th and 15th amendments and US Supreme Court rulings to argue that state officers cannot discriminate in jury lists. It notes federal enforcement through Congress and cautions indictments for officials who exclude based on race, with references to Ex parte Virginia and Strander v West Virginia and Virginia v Rives as supporting precedent.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
WaavicTor
N. C
P. Canaday
Prince
United States
North Carolina
U. S
The
United Timaina
Connor
Wensati
Leaat
Slaughter House
Supreme Court of the United States
Wallace
Strauder
West Va
Ruffin J
Oldham
First National Bank of Wilmington
Legislative Department
Atill
Exparte Virginis
Strong
Roy
Virginia
District of the United States
Supreme Court
Washington
Congress
Circuit Court of
Justice Harlan
Neal
Delaware
Patton
Moore
Cath
Edie
Tennessee
Davis
Btate
Hoskins
Reade
West Virginia
Strander
Otto
Patrick County
Supreme Court of the
Rives
Supreme” Court of the
United’ States
Pervision
Court of Oyer and Terminer
Newcastle County
Cour of Oyer and Terminer
Newcastle
Supreme Court of the United State
State of
Rydgees Neal
Drl. K. McRax
Also Mentioned on This Page
Prospectus
ITHE
National Reublican
Washington, D. C
Nationa’ 1
Sa Jor
Union
ARMY
NAVY
Ols
Pete
Ca Acalaane le
Las
Ita
Weekly Republican
Iecis
Carteu
Susbling
NASBY
Europe
Toledo Weekly Blade
Peraes Meathe
Lewes
Arta
Winneréuitan
Roart and Lodging
Caisatell
EaAne
Tormond
Fredericksburg and Potomac
Aseere
Tan
Emerenseigaaa A
Jo Faea
New York
Wi Rie
B.D. Moriel
Uptertaker
Carpenter Und Cabinet
Leswewe Friseme Ond Et
Gabe Eee
Agate
Itag
Letaune
Biareh, &c
Adrian & Vollers
Wilmington
Hein
San Sonora
Stinson
Montel Ear
Alwisxer
Frost
Ee Seep. c
Ses Oma