Postum Works Fights Back At Weekly Advertising Scraps
A Battle in Battle Creek over advertising and libel claims unfolds as Postum Works rebuts allegations from a New York attorney and the Weekly. The company details factory cleanliness, product ingredients, and advertising practices while dismissing sensational critiques.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
New York
Battle Creek
Testimonial Letters Back Postum Cereal Co Claim
Battle Creek Michigan December 30 1910 certify that all printed testimonials were backed by genuine signed letters and that the company has received over fifty thousand such letters. Signatories include M K How L J Lamson F C Grandin Kr M Sterrett M D Chesron Syer Harry B Burt TL C Tlawke C W Post with durations noted.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Postum Cereal Co. Intd
M. K. How
L. J. Lamson
F.C. Grandin
KR. M. Sterrett
M. D
Cheston Syer
Advt
Harry B. Burt
Postum and Grape-Nuts marketing defense in trial
A lengthy rebuttal defends Postum and Grape-Nuts against charges of deceptive nutrition claims. It asserts no cure claims, explains calorie discussions, defends testimonials, and details disputes with critics and a weekly publication over alleged misrepresentation.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
No- Bee
Publicscrap and legal faith in tribunals and Postum
The writer recalls being attacked and defending with facts before the public. An appeal to higher courts follows a libel suit against the weekly seeking 500000 dollars. They claim Postum Grape-Nuts and Post Toasties are pure, beneficial, and sold with integrity and honest service over years.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Ivery
Post
Mich
Maine
Penn
New Hamp
Postum Cereal Company
Mich. Penn
Dakota
Dairy and Food Commission of Michigan
Also Mentioned on This Page
Postum
Michigan
C. W. Post
Washington
Food Dept
A& Min
Federal Penitentiary
York
America
Underwood
Weekly
GC. W. Post
Europe
Postum Company
Ation
Raymond
Simon
Pawiow
Ochsner
Hammarsten
Carer
Mr. Post
Chen
Department of Science
Atti