Debate on prohibiting manufacture and traffic in ardent spirits
S P Johnson argues that banning the manufacture and sale of intoxicating liquors as a beverage is constitutional and necessary. He contends moral suasion alone fails to curb intemperance and urges Pennsylvania to lead in prohibition, citing social, economic and legal harms caused by rum taxation and crime.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Court House
Warren
Smethport
S. P. Johnson
Sons of Temperance
Howard
Rhode Island
United States
House of Correction
Hardihood
Teason
Law
Friends of Prohibition
Rmoen
Penn
Federal Arch
Pennsylvania
Lord
Gideon
Also Mentioned on This Page
THE
Warren Mail
B. Cowan
L. Rogers
Hutton & Bradley
Tyler Field
Jamestown
Johnson & Brown
Ludlow
P. Johnson
Rasselas Brown
John N. Miles
L. T. Parmlee
Water Street
Carver House
Warren Co
Wetmore & Woodin
Warren County
Second Street
L. D. Wellere
Geo D. Woodin
Scofield & Brown
Waterst
Glenni
W. Scofield
William D. Brown
Carvers & Arnett
Exchange
Warren, Warren Co
D. M. Williams
Temperance House
Nesmith & Goodrich
C. Exchange
Temperance
A. Fisher
Deerfield Township
J. B. Brown
Sugar Grove
Dorwin Greene
Ealer
Mansion House
Parmelee & Gilman
Carver
Water St
Z. Parmeler
H. Gilman
Summerton & Church
Ealers
Water St. Warren
Taylor & Messner
H. J. Taylor
T. S. Messner
Gilman Merrill
Deers
L. A. Geer
D.c. James & CO
Tanner’ S
P.R. Bennett
Z. Hl. Eddy
Hazeltine & CO
Variety Hall
W. Hazeltine
Aew. Breed
Waterstreet
Page
Pierce & Summerton
Third and
Hickory Streets
M. Pierce
L. Summerton
Ames & Davis
Benson & Werbacks
H. L. Towle
J. H. Hux
Hickory
Sugargrove
J. J. Willson
Diamond House
P. S. Coxe
Court Horse