Debate Over Adams Era Foreign Intercourse Funds
A scholarly exchange scrutinizes 1820s foreign intercourse appropriations. The speaker argues Mr. Adams set initial estimates and that Bartlett misassigned year 1825 to Adams, while detailing salary items and totals across 1822 1823 1824 1825 1827. The analysis compares administration spending with present policy, aiming to assign accountability for expenditures.
Debates Over Foreign Intercourse Costs and Appropriations
The speaker analyzes three year expenditures and appropriations for foreign intercourse from 1823 to 1828, arguing that Bartlett's figures misstate totals by counting treaty-driven obligations as diplomatic costs. He cites official documents, notes balances, and contrasts Adams and Monroe administrations, urging precise accounting and criticizing excess secret-service spending.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Buetlett
Becaese
Nularius
Bartlett
Treasury
Ptr
Department of State
Bartleute
Teaz
Cnmparitan
Bere
Nant Barre
Bartten
Wentleman
Helis
Eavey
Nhaw
Eniniey
Seybert
Legation
N. Hampshire
Han
Seyhert
United States
Great Britain
Amer
Hampshire
Mr. Jefferson
Jefferson
Washington
Adama
Trentira
Bor Lal Parpuae
Chen
Barnlett
Wits
Monroe
Adams
Mr. Adams
New Hampshire
Congress
J. 8. Barbour
Standing Committee On
Amu
Barbour
Meimeelgen
Imettert
Mesaell
Dave
Bert Holt
Also Mentioned on This Page
Nix Wesvilian
Addie
Secretary of the Treasury
Tony Sau
London
Paris
Fresen
South America
Linake
Nooe
Friy
Barilote
Europe
Pinus
Monrice
Mearon
Altos
Brit
Mle Bartlett
Poate
Hondon
Barilert
Mr. Bateleds
Aim Lerth
Feaer
Dleman
Newtiona
RIVE
P. S
State Department
House of
Senate
Nnion
Wit
Niles
Jassex
Master Taylors of
Wenlel
Hormitien