Gallipoli rout and submarine activity dominate war news
Gallipoli forces suffer decisive setback as Allied advances slow the push on multiple fronts. German submarines operate aggressively, sinking six large merchant ships and a Russian vessel in three days, prompting debate over U.S. stance and the ethics of unrestricted warfare.
Russians Hold Line as Austro German Push Folds
News from May 31 reports Russian resistance stiffening near Alen and in Galicia as Austro German forces retreat across the Dubysa river with losses in guns and prisoners. German advances in the Baltic provinces are checked while Italian and Austrian main bodies lag behind, and Turkish fronts show heavy fighting with Turkish losses rising.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
London
Gal-lipoli
Dardanelles
Athena Wainy
Ciellinal
Trussian
Atal
Corman
Galles
Alen
Leweger
Trzemyel
Mack
Baltie
Messian War Office
Dubysa
Therinas
Gaia
Varroes
le Protre Dorest
al~ Bure
Frontery of Erman Answer in London Commentary
London commentary critiques the German reply to the American note on submarine warfare. It cites the sinking of ships, the alleged intention to avoid direct acknowledgment, and tensions over naval actions and potential negotiations with the United States. It notes claims about passengers and scenarios where capsules of ammunition might have influenced events.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
White Star Line
Germany
O Trenther
Megantic
Westminster Gazette
Lusitania
Pimk
Liverpool
United States
Evening Standard
Gerra
America
Wilson
New York
Washington
Ber- Jin
London
Manchester Guardian
de Glyar
United Tates
Banel
Hopmany
St. Louis Globe-Democrat
Omaha Ber
Kniver
Lyin
Wilhelmst
Aloux City
Philadelphia
Albany
Kailekorbucker Press
Il 18
Des Moles
D. C
Post
Barafety
Boston Herald
Indianapolia Usily Telegraph
Trin
Pittabure Gazette Times
Corteaua
Berlin
Thoro Zn
Americn
Ousheing
Gulflight
Aubravine
Cubpo
Benerias
International Commission of Inquiry
nTo- Pee
Articl Wi
Hague
Faiaba
Anto
Assatgnee Af Cie
Ias Alendy
Itsikeen
Juositania
Unite States
Imperial Kovernment
Lualtania
Admiralty
Mente
Caramite
Britta
German reply on Lusitania note draws mixed judgments
Across New York papers the German response to the American protest over the Lusitania sinking is judged polite yet unsatisfactory. Editors debate whether Berlin fully acknowledges the issue, with some calling the note evasive while others see courteous wording masking hard aims and potential danger to neutral rights.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
New York Times
New York
Wilson
Berlin
Lusitania
New York Tribune
Germany
High Seas
Yorr von Jagen
W York Press
von Tirpitz Admiralty
New York Herald
German Note 10 United Demands and German Reply
The article surveys American and British reactions to Germanys note on Lusitania. It cites editorials from Indianapolis Star Louisville Courier Journal and others, condemning German evasiveness and urging firm American response while outlining Germanys stated investigations and assurances regarding neutral ships, including Lusitania, and the counts of armed ships and safety measures.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Indianapolis Star
Germany
Louisville Courier-Journal
United States
Also Mentioned on This Page
Gallipoli
Foreign Office
Ethiope
Tullochmoor
Engteh Channel
Ping Luey
Trymouth
Windimer Glenle
North Sea
Mars
Spennymoor
Cadeby
Furthermars
Megwatte
Lagden
Dierman
Pilhelm
Arras
Constantinople
War Office
Ariburma
Val Seddul Bahr
Seddui Bahr
Parié
Notre Dame de Lorette
Neuville St
Hot Springs
Dan Ensign
New York World
Pettifos Bing
Gernajiy
Navy
Chicago Tribune
Chicago
Tusitania
St. Louis Republic
Milwaukee Sentinel
Chicago Journal
Yeasel 6
Solent
Wile Evmed
Imperia Arial Core
British Shipping Company
Ogden
United States Postal
Ogden Examiner