The Philippines and Self Government Debate
A lengthy speech argues against immediate self government for the Philippines, urging cautious American administration. It asserts that natives lack readiness, praises gradual reform, and calls for strong administrators to guide development and ensure stable governance.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
America
Fertii
Emines Jan Restere
Cebus Mountain
Pablo Matin
Jamin
Philiggrine
Philippines
Mimsenas
Boalirs
Iiport
Tig Ielaade
Dhe
Ypath
New York
Manila
Thas
Thune Hu
Holle
Sulu
Céela
Hong Kong
Mactie Hire
Chonteaud
Cebu
Meares
Truve
Cain
Jeueta Lawton
Barre
Chicago
Bayt
MacArtier
San Fernando
Dudio
Vaniom
Peeble
Thay
Oriantelium
Spain
New England
American Republic
Hughes
Crow
Smith
Unes
Aguinaldo
Sandieo
Otis
Admiral Dewar
Laly
Evaeina
Tonefert
United States
Wiley
Schursiman
Mismila
Leon Hucoughly
America Goldiers
Archipwlaga
Wir
Flua Aguinaldo
Senate
Washington
George
Tenzon
Panay
Pilipinds
Barsen
Fetcent
Eral
Mar Terces
Alicia
Kraltar
Dssed
Treanure
Kiew
Barscanes
Misrule
Uberty
Mberty
Lberty
Becaus
Iabor
Met
T Met
Luzon
Oury
Nuit
Childran
Therourhagas
Java
Holland
England
Germany
Palusa
Paluan Sulu
Mindanao
Negros
Department of State
Mantla
Vernors
Bim
Paluan
Bny
Allief
Spilo
Cortez
Ula
Cuba
Santiago
Republic
Jessen
Mvst
Bore
Sdcak
Mont “Avery
Lerty
Teventis
The
Barbariam
Berty
Yan de Brouser
India
Louisiana
Piorida
Tamitsiana
Alaska
Tim
Pelsgo
Huasta
Siberian
Atlantic
Munt
Transvaal
Liberty
California
Tone
Garth
Also Mentioned on This Page
God
Cobo
Toyo
Orient
Pacific
Moet
Aaval
Ehmens
Mitte
Hite
Ain Poahibie
Bend
Olly
Indias
Indiana
Thin
Manelton
Poough Tramps
Abe
Gence
Ang Get
Leb Spada
Nowen- Det
TessOent
Perpitus
Americas
United Line
Wnr
Ian Fower
Net
Tenn
Ks Cone
Loder
Navy
McCulionga
Bowars
Aatlan
Congress
Wulth
Patton Ives
Peigne
Thadadie
Wwe
Haworth
Stedlf
Adi
Canary
Grint