Oil price controls debated as ripoff or bonanza for consumers
The debate over ending oil and gas price controls centers on whether deregulation will cut costs or raise them. Carter’s plan would lift natural gas ceilings and extend regulation, while opponents warn of windfalls for industry. Estimates vary, but the stakes run into trillions for Americans over two decades, with analyses splitting on potential consumer savings versus higher bills.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Stan Benjamin Washington
Carter
Department of Energy
Associated Press
Senate
Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries
U.S
Jim Flug
Energy Action Consumer Group
Flug
House of Representatives
Edward W. Erickson
North Carolina State University
James M. Collins
R-Texas
H. A. Merklein
The
University of Dallas
NAACP backs oil industry on energy debate report
The NAACP breaks with the Carter administration, urging deregulated oil and gas prices and greater nuclear power, opposing coal conversion. The group argues blacks need jobs from a growing economy and more energy, while supporting efficiency and arguing for new energy supply funding. The stance targets Congress and the energy conference committee as the energy program fate unfolds.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
New York Times
Washington
NAACP
National Association For the Advancement of Colored People
Association
National Energy
Capitol Hill
Congress
Energy Conference Committee
Carter
Also Mentioned on This Page
Pblic
Erickson
Energy Committee
James R. Schlesinger
James Stewart Sr
Oklahoma City
Oklahoma Gas and Electric Co
Ately
Utilities
Lad and
Lassie Town & Country Village
Arion
Sears
Sears Convenient Credit
U.S.D.A
Encyclopaedia
Murphysboro
Duncan Hines
Gene
Wronk’s
Crisco Oil
Miracle
BOW Wow Dog
Washington State
APPLE
Hyde Park
Igers
Hyde Park Soda
Geff Orance Uc
ENAN
Fa Prac
SUN
Kist I
Riaifia
Ange
Ves
Pm Weiers Ce
nMiiverAnn