U S Protests Plan Against Britain's Blockade
Washington reports six notes issued by the State Department reveal U S and Allied powers debating the scope of maritime blockade against Germany. The notes show Britain and France accepting a blockade in principle but seeking to limit belligerent rights over neutral ships, while Germany agrees to abolish submarine warfare except to enforce visits and searches. The communications expose tensions over neutral shipping safety and the practical reach of a blockade in European and adjacent waters.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Washington
T.n
Great Britain
Germany
Wis
Americas
United States
Oiheile
Vollentimg
Maude Battle
Diplomatie
Unites States
Freeze
Armerican
London
Germnany
Apy Fing
Vnewt
Contron
Garimany
Ita
Nat Wmertert
Mnnemy
Selze
Enam
Senate
Muulilalping
New York
Halifax
Republic
Nam
First U S Note Seeks to Protect Neutral Shipping
The document reports a 1915 US note proposing terms to safeguard neutral shipping amid UK Germany hostilities. It outlines recommendations on mines, submarine warfare, neutral food imports, and merchant shipping rules, with Germany signaling conditional agreement and urging reciprocal, humane measures.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
U.S
Second U S Note Questions Blockade Zone Definition
The United States asks Britain and France how their embargo declarations on trade with Germany would operate in practice. The London message discusses determining enforcement, blockades, contraband rules, and the implications for neutral ships and cargoes under varying conditions amid submarine warfare.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
U. S
Britain's Blockade Policy Notes and Order In Council
The British government replies to American inquiries on March 1 1915 about blockade measures and neutral trade. It explains discretionary powers under the Order in Council to enforce measures against German commerce, detailing vessel and cargo handling, neutral rights, and exceptions, and notes aims to avoid harming neutral interests while enforcing blockade.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Magesty
Cargnea
Nmost
Ford
Enajesiz
Nentral
Finny
Gyour
Yessii
Sauls
German reply to American ambassador Inman Gerard March 4 1917
Germany informs American ambassador Inman W Gerard that the imperial government has received the note with interest and will consider the concerns raised. The communication reflects formal diplomatic handling of tensions in the Berlin note of March 4 1917 and emphasizes cautious engagement.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Brown
Citizens’ Teague
Beethoven Hall
T. T. VanderHoeven
Citizen’s League
Berlin
Inman W. Gerard
United Staton of America
Pola
Britain replies to American ambassador on war at sea
Britain releases the March 16 1915 statement detailing the March 13 memorandum. It notes Germany’s reply to the February note and their stance on submarine attacks and mine warfare, while expressing sympathy with the United States desire for lawful conduct of the European war within international norms. The British government asserts its own position and calls for restraint amid the ongoing conflict.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Ita Hiatis
Germany
England
Ireland
Rextrictlan
Oyr
Great Andrus
France
Wolentarly
New York
United States
United Stites
Great Bellaly
Uniwd
Great Britain
Nevith
Recuss
Aia
London
Washington
Med
Edwant Gry
Gerlucy
Tas
Cully
Fis Jurivilege
The
United, States
ZeTiat
Wensele
Eren
International Ins
Ehia Sovern
Men Bryan
Lon
Ion
Toudstaffe
Tha Ermah
Ventras
Acton Sourod
Helgium
Tarestory
Belegium
Amer
Avaphos
Vaswols
Brye
Brattle
Queenstown
Torpado
Scarborough
Yarmouth
Whitby
Garman
Tagsland
Cridelime
Britain
Prise Court
Carsa
Wilhelmine
Laod
Grey
ReTeemant
Canhon
Balngoo
Britten
Sargol Ad across Texas Promises Quick Weight Gain
An early 20th century advertisement touts Sargol as a regenerative fat-bearing agent to treat nervous dyspepsia and digestive failure. The copy claims it boosts absorption from the stomach and intestines, delivering fat to the blood to fill out lean bodies.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Her
Wagner
San Antonio
Chen
Warlle Borgel
France Replies On Trade Restrictions and Retaliation
The French government outlines its stance on recent communications from Paris and London regarding restrictions on trade and potential retaliation. It notes U.S. concerns over possible maritime actions near American waters and the risk of increased tensions with European ships in transit.
Also Mentioned on This Page
Europe
Germay
Needies
Wurtherware
Shirase
Tescaire
von Tagow
Herlin
Hve
Prince Bismarck
Count Capriot
Therstore
Aiuts
Ambaamdor
McRetary
Tessin
Priso
Marahul
Prisg
Whdet
Ivery
Tse
Gothind
Evers
Mayen
UriGah
Rrawn
Ena
Hin Oc
Nantral
Londons
People’s Municipal Plague
Brotyn
GUYS
McFarland
Chekhvan People’s Municipal League
Fowler
Apalldeul Adios Dlulig
Harlin
Worer
Parks Mobel
Licet
Mohak
Amores
Velvet