Supreme Court rules Southern Pacific abusing stock control
The Supreme Court declares that Southern Pacific ownership of Central Pacific stock violated the Sherman Act by creating a unified transcontinental system. The ruling prohibits the Southern Pacific from maintaining control through stock ownership and directs a remedy to restore competitive conditions between the rival routes and connections. The Central Pacific and Union Pacific are shown as separate lines to be operated without favoritism.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
The
Supreme Court of the United States
Central Pace Railroad Company
Union Pacifc Railroad Company
Codgen
Agiodt
Central Pacific Railroad
Ita Gun
Hugopert i
Union Pace
Pacifc
Ane Wanteols
Sutherly
Racemes
Lanon Pacife
Rau
Odzen
Southern Pacific
Congress
Condesian
Centrat Pacfic
Southern Pacfic
Centrat Pacific
Court Rules Southern Pacific Freight Policy Favored
The Supreme Court states that the Southern Pacific system favors transportation on its line, owning the route and receiving full freight compensation. The Central Pacific is reportedly subsidized by its own road and water lines, with less favorable treatment in the freight flow.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Supreme Court
Southern Pacific Rystem
Also Mentioned on This Page
Central Pacific
Pacific
Middle West
Califoraia
Atlantic Seaboard
San Franscisco
Eran Ys Pac Iy
Southern Pache Hoes
Central Pacifie Railroad
Union Pacifie Railroad
Central Paci
Sacramento
Utah Gateway
San Francisco
el Pass
Sacraments
Galveston
San
Francisco
New Orleana
Peerfizs
China
Transvar Tha
Ite
Oriven Bue
Urea Pacific
Ite Eastern
Ogden
Southern Pacific Lines
Utah
Nevada