Federal Regulation and Civil Rights in Public Life
The piece argues that Southern and other states denied minority political participation via at large voting and reapportionment blocks, while federal courts and national government expanded rights. It cites court decisions improving representation, federal intervention in labor and environmental issues, and the necessity of national standards for national commerce and safety, contrasting state autonomy with the benefits of federal regulation.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
South
Connecticut
Maryland
Supreme Court
Illinois
New Jersey
Oklahoma
Reagan
America
SedeadVwnerat Hierse Tearg Ohl
At&t
Afl-Cio
General Motors
DuPont
Delaware
Washington
Gary
Ind
US Steel Corporation
U.S. Steel
Lake Erie
Michigan
Ohio
Pennsylvania
New York
Four Square
Justice Department
ShahLes
Mars
Costs and benefits of federal regulation urged
The piece argues that abolishing federal rules would bring disastrous results including polluted waterways and air, degraded landscapes, monopolies, and widespread corporate greed. It warns that factories would contaminate rivers, mining would scar terrain, forests would vanish, and workers would die as profits rise.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Energy m Jes
Wind
Also Mentioned on This Page
California
Jimmy Carter
Detroit
Maine
Mississippi River
Chesapeake Bay
Jenkins Motors
Firenza
Firenzas
Omegas
the News
Frederick
Ma. Thuredey
Marels
Routzahn
Routzahn's
East Patrick Street