Supreme Court obscenity rulings engine clash with public standards
The Supreme Court continues to struggle defining obscenity nine years after a landmark decision. Justices debate which materials deserve First Amendment protection, with questions about who judges social importance and what constitutes contemporary standards. The column notes ongoing divisions and uncertainty in applying the law.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Barry Schweid
Washington
Supreme Court
Arkansas Supreme Court
William J. Brennan
Earl Warren
Tom C. Clark
William C. Douglas
Hugo L. Black
Potter Stewart
Also Mentioned on This Page
World Today
United States
Massachusetts
James Marlow
Lewistown
WSCS
W.S.C.S
Church Hall
Marlin Green
Jewell Beeson
Yarnell Wastler
James Rhoten
Beeson
Sharon Grimes
Emogene Michael
New York
New York City
Joseph H. Louchheim
Louchheim
Arpes
RCA Victor
RCA
Colo
Recorders
Stere
Act
Hee Meas
Segovia
Portsmouth
Concert
Nottingham
Pitas
Routzahn’s
Patrick Street
Shipley’s, Inc
North Market Street
People’s Home & Auto Store
Brunswick
Storm & Shipley
Thurmont, Md