Trade policy clash spurs protection debate in Victoria
Melbourne opinion pages argue for protective tariffs while South Australia backs free trade. The piece contrasts British and American tariff policies and warns against applying a single principle to diverse economies. It notes Britain's manufacturing strength and America's protectionist shift, urging Victoria to choose protection as a path to native industry and employment amid population growth and colonial needs.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
South Australia
England
United States of America
America
Victoria
Britain
Ervey Tithes Cimitey
Arta
Gresik
Beiiik
Staten Alin Vamie
Amerizons & Large
Tinjpurt
Ghaies
Wult
Mintoe
Ameria
Essetions and Qualifications Committee
Turthar
Willces
Heytesbury
Burlnige
Ireland
Red Mt
East Collingwood
Samuel Turner
Jones Sar Wuscult
Bawards
Earl of Zetland
Turner
Jones
Edwarde
Jonge Usd
Turence
Coats
Mary Wilson
Prances M’namar
Granken
Collis
Lim
Bull and Mouth
Geo. Coppin
Melbourne
Richmond
Also Mentioned on This Page
Tontrt, Kaya Sieh
Prince
Ior
Lacrs
Spee
Frazer
Grant
Ballacrat
Aiswer
Bervice
Heales
Donald
Buckland’s Creel
Henlon
St. Kilda and
Brighton
Higinbotham
Rullway
Jar
Sprakers
Litterbw
Swyar
Brighton and
Kilda
Se Bryer
Tal
Jon
Jaunlon
Trentore
Tnwghd
Me Urey
Tive
Dusty
Ferme Howe
Attorney-General
Michie
Mir Verdon
Princis
Wood
Howe
Francia
House
Mc Wool
Gray
Evans
Westuiwater Hall
Bacon
Contin
Cormillioner
isriiTe
Verdon
Progrem
Obianes Taye
Loader
Hagland
Wales
Dale Spreagerep
Musara
Mason
Dawson
Martley
Youon
William Kinogwell
Yarre Ferry
Hobson's Day
Emerald Hill
Flinders Street
Biancock
St. Kilda Toon
Mali
Mendr
Sobsi
Balfa
Como
Moret Bey
Gary A
Thurstay
Strenst
Hie
Ueno
Paris
Eh SH
Chinn
Slcenpore
Colin
Walingrne
Mater Town
Abis de Latloion
Mie