Supreme Court lets schools drug test extracurricular students
The 5-4 decision allows drug testing of students in competitive activities and teams, extending beyond athletes. The ruling supports district efforts to curb drug use, focusing on those in after school programs, while critics call it a violation of privacy. Justice Breyer wrote to note aims of reducing peer pressure, with dissents emphasizing potential overreach.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Washington
Supreme Court
Sarng
Lindsay Earls
Goody Two Shoes
America
Graham Boyd
American Civil Liberties Union
Earls
Boyd
Stephen Breyer
Ginsburg
John Paul Stevens
Sandra Day O’connor
David Souter
Bush
Tecumseh
Okla
Board of Education of Independent School District No. 92
Pottawatomie County
Court upholds Ohio school voucher program
The Supreme Court ruled vouchers do not violate the constitution, backing an inner city Cleveland program providing up to $2,250 per child for private, church, and some public schools. Justices Rehnquist, O Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas wrote for the majority, while Souter led a strong dissent joined by Stevens, Ginsburg, and Breyer.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Clarence Thomas
William H. Rehnquist
Antonin Scalia
Anthony M. Kennedy
Stephen Breyer
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Oklahoma
Supreme Court
Bush
Cleveland
Ohio
Sandra Day O’connor
David H. Souter
John Paul Stevens
Souter
Stevens
America
Court ruling sparks interest in education vouchers in Kansas
The 5-4 ruling opens doors for state or federal programs letting parents use tax funds for private school enrollment. Private schools like Veritas Christian School and Bishop Seabury Academy anticipate enrollment boosts and broader socio economic diversity, while officials warn about potential government regulation and string attached to funds.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Lawrence
Kansas
Doug Bennett
Veritas Christian School
N. Mich
Chris Carter
Bishop Seabury Academy
1850 Road
Episcopal School
Bishop Seabury
Carter
Bob Voboril
Kansas Association of Independent and Religious Schools
Voboril
Wichita
Weseman
Bennett
Veritas
Supreme Court bars outdoor chaining of inmates in Alabama case
The Supreme Court ruled 6 3 that chaining disruptive inmates to outdoor posts is cruel and unusual punishment and allows prisoners to sue guards even when following orders. The decision, tied to Alabama's 1995 1998 policy, expands rights for up to 400 inmates including Larry Hope who alleged seven hour restraint without a bathroom break. The ruling also upheld broad limits on campaign restrictions for judicial candidates in a separate decision.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
U.S. Supreme Court
Alabama
John Paul Stevens
Craig Jones
Larry Hope
Hope
Supreme Court
Kansas
High Court
Minnesota
Also Mentioned on This Page
Tim Carpenter
Waddell
SSF
Reed Financial Services
Waddell.com
SIPC
Coo Ron
Arensberg
Massachusetts
Discover. Lawrence
Rome
Hwy
Classic Cars
Lawrence Funeral Chapel
Douglas County
Midland
Topeka
Hospiceate
Ham