Perspective on Warren Court undoing due process shifts
Former Chief Justice Earl Warren reflects on the Irvine V. California eavesdropping case and Wolf V. Colorado, noting privacy abuses and evolving views. He discusses court independence from political pressure, court collegiality, and the significance of Reynolds V. Simms and Baker V. Carr in establishing one person one vote.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Earl Warren
Supreme Court
California
Eisenhower
Republican Party
Warren
United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Reynolds
Irvine Dog Bark Triggered Privacy Ruling in 1951 Case
The High Court’s first criminal case for Earl Warren involved Pat Irvine convicted on bugged evidence from a Long Beach police operation. A barking dog alerted a homeowner to a bugging and dusting of documents, leading to a Justice Department review and a 5-4 ruling that, while illegal, allowed the evidence to stand.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Pat Irvine
Irvine
Earl Warren
U.S. Supreme Court
Warren
High Court
Second St
Long Beach
William H. Dovey
Justice Department
Supreme Court
Also Mentioned on This Page
By Anthony Lewis
New York Times Co
Justice Jackson
Colorado
Warren Court
Particu
Reynolds v. Simms
High
By Bill Homer
Southern
Californie
Dooley
Westinghouse
SDH RE
Scooley’s Hardware Mart
Poul Ee
Delta
Dallas
Orlando
Cape Kennedy
Deltamatic
Los Angeles
Dallas/Ft.Worth
Adelta