Prohibition and temperance contrasted in liquor control
A debate on prohibition and temperance argues prohibition targets manufacture and sale while temperance targets drinking. It claims repeal would boost liquor’s social acceptability and endanger youth, urging continued prohibition as essential to protect self control and morality.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
United States
America
Prohibition facts on federal revenues and outcomes
A compilation cites 1920 1930 federal receipts 548 588 884 revenues from fines penalties and revenue and 284 156 524 enforcement costs leaving a net 264 432 360 to the federal government. It questions enforcement burden and contrasts pre 1919 tax totals and post repeal effects with Canada and US comparisons. It asks if prohibition has reduced deaths and crime and warns North Carolina against similar outcomes.
Also Mentioned on This Page
Friends of Temperance
Col. Woodcock
Prohibition
Statis
Westerville
Ohio
U. S. States
Canada
Canada Bureau of Statistics
England
Germany
Travelers Insurance Company
North Carolina
H. A. Millis
A. W. Plyler
A. C. Metz
High Point
J. Allen Austin
D. T. Andrews
M. J. Crowder
Clara Cox
A. B. Conrad
W. A. Davis
C. M. Davis
Roy I. Farmer
L. F. Ferree
C. S. Grayson
W. B. Hall
John Hedrick
Frank Hunsucker
A. B. Horney
A. H. Holton
C. R. Hinshaw
G. Ray Jordan
W. L. Jackson
O. E. Kearns
G. H. Kearns
R. O. Lindsay
C. A. Lewis
W. B. McEwen
H. W. McCain
Dred Peacock
Tom Powell
Logan Porter
D. Ralph Parker
W. F. Plemming
R. H. Sechrest
Tom Sykes
John C. Sheloff
A. Sherrod
Fred N. Tate
A. E. Tate
F. R. Taylor
G. T. Tunstall
M. J. Wrenn
Fa Ia Ioa