The Freeholder Critiques First Come Principle in Land Societies
A 1899 letter argues that mutual benefit land societies fail under first come first served rules. It warns the equity gap favors early members, creating lottery like allotments and delaying others while investments remain strained. The Birmingham Conference debate is cited, urging changes to avoid systemic risk and preserve growth.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Birmingham
Freeholder
Elijah Dixon
Bright
Council of the Freeholders Union
London
Westminster
St. Pancras
National
To the Editor of The Freeholder Letter on land societies and fairness
A reader questions why land societies limit purchases to land and not other goods. They ask if buying shares to value of a 3d take would be unfair to members and wonder about the system's equity and purpose. The missive critiques the logic of such restrictions and calls for clarity.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Freeholder
Sin
Paragora
National
Freehold Land Society
Cobden
Wilkinson
Morley
Gilpin
London
Friend’s house purchase and lawyer fees noted
A correspondent writes that a friend recently bought a house for £280 and the solicitor’s fees amounted to nearly £30. The letter expresses a view on conveyance costs and advises caution in legal transactions.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
A. M.N
Allotment Experiences Shared By Members
A correspondent asks fellow members to report how they used their allotments. The writer, Omicus, notes he has an allotment but cannot garden yet and seeks ideas from others to make it useful. He mentions a vote and the forty shillings yearly allotment as potential benefits.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Freeholder
Drar Srrr
Omicus
Draining and sewering urged for Walthamstow allotments
A letter to the editor from Wood-street dated March 20 1851 argues that Freehold Land Societies should seek Board of Health inspectors to lecture on drainage. The writer details 80 allotments at Walthamstow and condemns cesspools, urging a complete sewer from top to bottom to fund costs through manure savings, promising further remarks forthcoming.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Freeholder
Freehold Land Societies
Board of Health
Walthamstow
Mr. Cobden
Wood-street
A. B.C
Reform Debate on Freehold Land Societies Rests on Fair Access
A critic contends that National Freehold Land Society rules favor wealthier members who pay up and secure allotments, while poorer applicants pay monthly. He argues the system undermines thrift aims and risks future inequities as capitalists gain advantages over working people.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Freehold Land Society
Birmingham
Freehold Land Societies
Walthamstow
Freehold Land Societies Debate Views and Call for Action
A letter from March 26 1851 argues that the real issue is neglect of smaller investors while bigger holders gain influence. The writer urges Mr Whittingham or another figure to explain the matter publicly. The editor notes many Freehold Land Societies may eventually adopt equal drawing rules and member allotments, and calls for broad discussion.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Whittingham
National Freehold
Land Society
Freeholder expansion needs caution says reader
A London reader urges restraint as THE FREEHOLDER enlarges its scope. He warns overzealous management could cause harm and calls for independent scrutiny and accountability for trustees. He questions borrowing by the society and seeks editor guidance on the issue.
Remarks on National Freehold Land Society rule changes
A letter from a Freeholder reader critiques alterations to member admission timing and profit sharing. The author notes earlier subscribers faced longer waits than new joiners and argues for fair treatment, urging delay of changes until legal confirmation to avoid rushed decisions and a forced meeting turnout.
Also Mentioned on This Page
The
National Freehold Land Society
Executive Committee
This is just the beginning! Our collection holds over 300 years of history, including rare newspapers, obituaries, marriage records, birth records, and so much more—most of which you won’t find anywhere else!