Bryan Urges Bank Deposit Security Aimed at Victory
Colonel William J. Bryan argues that Democratic gains signal victory and presses for universal bank deposit insurance. He criticizes current safeguards, cites bank failures, and notes examples from Oklahoma, urging banks to back deposits and protect savers. The talk emphasizes public trust, financial security, and national money staying within the United States.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
William J. Bryan
A Word from Mr Bryan on Bank Deposits Guarantee
A Bryan comment argues that declaring deposits guaranteed protects depositors and the community. He says uncertainty harms banks and prompts insolvency, and he prefers banks handle banking rather than government control, urging a deposits guarantee as an easy solution to financial troubles.
Straus Endorses Bryan Citing Broad Prosperity Hope
Wathan Straus a New York merchant and philanthropist explains his reasons for backing Mr. Bryan. He asserts Bryan will be elected, will foster general prosperity, and serve all people as a safe conscientious president regardless of class. He criticizes panic predictions and pledges support until election day.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Hanis
Mr. Bryan
Baltimore
Fidelity
Postal Savings Bank
Europe
United States
New York
Uncle Sans Manor
Sillsga
le Farmer
Oklahoma
Wathan Straus
Bryan
Onn
Taft campaign poster outlines labor and trusts clash
A circulated poster features Judge Tafts appearance across cities. It claims Taft will explain how he gained power, accuses his backers including Standard Oil allies, and asserts he opposes jury trials for laborers while Wall Street trusts back him. It notes committee ordering.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
William H. Taft
United State
Toraker
Standard Oil Company
United States
Wall Street
Paani
Principle over party in tariff reform says Edward A Ross
Economist Edward A Ross now at Wisconsin University argues tariff schedules must be guided by a rational principle protecting public and national interests rather than by private and party contributions. He criticizes the Dingley act as influenced by profiteers, urging schedules that reflect labor cost differences and public welfare over corporate influence.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Edward A. Ross
Wisconsin University
Holt
United States
Leary
Party
Edwand Aesworth Ross
Pottery tariff debate shifts to relief from monopoly prices
Mr Tutt advocates revising tariffs on pottery to ease consumer relief, while plain ware faces 3 percent duty and decorated ware 0 percent. Freight costs and packing duties raise overall price impacts, with The New York Times noting protection may fail to curb imports and arguing home industry is strong enough to resist duties. The Times questions why Tate can set the market alone.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Yatt
Tutt
New York Times
Tutt Qader
Ss Srmiy
Past Promises Broken In Republican Platform Clash
Papav Friendly to Taft doubts good faith of party as calls rise for policy changes. Remarks cite past reciprocity promises and tariff fights, noting manufacturers seek higher duties. Critics accuse party leaders of duplicity while arguing for a clear explanation of Republican missteps over ten years of ascendency.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Papav
Taft
Republieda
Republican Party
Sloven
Dennis
New York Journal of Commerce
New York
Hein
Agaider
Democrata
How to Vote in the New Ballot System Instructions
Voters should study the new voting method and understand the ballot layout. The Democratic device is a roaster and the Republican device is an acorn. the Democratic column appears first, followed by Republican, with presidential electors listed before state candidates.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Yutlog
Republicas
Voting Instructions and Election Law Excerpt
Instructions outline casting ballots by state county and township, or by machine, with emphasis on straight party voting and marks. It cites penalties for buying or selling votes, and notes procedures for voters unable to read English or mark ballots. It preserves historical language and includes the 1905 act details.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Lst
Imag
Lise
Indus
Althougt
Taft Tariff Debate Sparks Trusts Tax Fight
Jesse F. Orton argues that high duties tempt monopolistic trusts and that removing excess rates while enforcing injunctions and prosecutions could curb monopoly. He dismisses Taft’s claim that freeing trust products would destroy business and calls for tariffs to curb temptations without harming productive capital.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Llegal Teasta
Frisis
Taft
Ibeva
Mo Taft
Steel Trust
Oll Trust
Borat Trust
United States
Jesse F. Orton
Reasonable Profits and the Fate of Willa Leeds
A garbled piece discusses profits tied to a manufacturer and associates claiming a monopoly in the American market. It notes a $30,000 estate linked to Willa Leeds and a duty of $20 per ton, suggesting ulterior motives and critiques of industrial gains impacting workers and the broader public.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Willa
Leeds
Thim
Who Is to Be the Judge in the Proposed Grammars Dispute
The passage questions who should judge what is reasonable in a dispute over grammar and profiteering. Edward M. Shepard argues that profiteers will defend their actions as reasonable, a conclusion deemed eminently reasonable, though the text remains muddled.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Gramnter
Edward M. Shepard
Also Mentioned on This Page
Mr. ‘Bryan
Straus
Judge Taivs
Blaster atbLarge
Adam Heimberger
Winfield T. Ditrein
Tne
MR. Taft
Ket