Laetrile case tests public health vs patient rights
The Supreme Court decision on Laetrile probes whether government power to protect health should override individual treatment choices. It highlights tension between privacy rights and public safety, noting the need for a clearer balance as courts weigh protection with personal access to alleged therapies.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Supreme Court
High Court
Ombudsman urges access to property assessment records
State ombudsman condemns Washington County assessor Ernest Lund for denying public access to worksheet cards, arguing the records are public funded and must be open for scrutiny. He says income data can be excluded but property details must be available, with photocopies offered to address privacy and tampering concerns.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Washington
Ernest Lund
State Citizens Aid/Ombudsman
Bill Angrick
State Department of Revenue
Call for a Joint Contingency Planning Staff to Coordinate Global Action
The piece argues for a permanent allied planning body outside NATO with no binding command role. It highlights repeated failures to consult, delays in joint stand, and the need for realistic long range coordination for crises beyond Europe. It proposes a Joint Contingency Planning Staff open to contributing members and capable of leveraging existing expertise.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Paris
Afghanistan
London
United States
Cyrus Vance
Bonn
Lord Carrington
NATO
France
Europe
When judges are political they need restraint and reform
The piece argues judges’ political leanings need limits as presidents pick Supreme Court nominees. It notes Reagan’s pledge to appoint a woman, cites Eleanor Smeal’s critique, and discusses the lifetime tenure of federal judges, impeachment rarity, and secrecy of confirmation hearings.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Washington
Ronald Reagan
U.S. Supreme Court
Eleanor Smeal
National Organization For Women
Reagan
Carter
American Judicature Society
Political influence shapes federal judges and contingency planning
The piece argues that judicial nominations are inherently political, rewarding allies and shaping philosophy. It notes Carter's success with nominees, Jeffersonian doubts about life tenure, and advocates political restraints. It also discusses Western contingency planning, urging pre drafted scenarios to deter crises and improve coordination among major powers.
Think for Yourselves in Security and Politics
Paul A. Smith cautions against emotionally insecure followers who seek security through leaders and militarism. He argues for independent thinking, warns against theological and political manipulation, and urges voters to think and vote wisely in the 1980 election. The piece critiques church state tensions and urges personal responsibility at the polls.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Jesus of Nazareth
Jesus
Paul A. Smith
Cedar Rapids
Coe College
Periodic Observations From Eastern Iowans
A reader invitation invites thoughtful residents of Eastern Iowa to share personal observations on any topic. Views are unscripted and belong to the contributors, reflecting local perspective and broad curiosity.
Also Mentioned on This Page
J.F. Hladky, Jr
Board of
Joe Hladky III
John Donnelly
Eaivor
Art Heusinkveld
the Gazette
Col
Jonathan Alford
International Institute For Strategic Studies
Strait of Hormuz
West
Kolwezi
Zaire
U.S
York Times
Hans Dietrich Genscher
Flora Lewis
Wort Star Telegram Hyume
Hamilton
Congress
Sen. Orrin Hatch
American Spectator
President Carter
Senate Judiciary Committee
Hatch
Universal Press Syndicate
Senate
George Washington
Circuit
Nixon
Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson
Rome
Ottawa
Canberra
Tokyo
Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr
James J. Kilpatrick