Facts and Opinion Iowa in Washington Dropping New Deal Stirs Hornet Nest
The piece surveys Washington reactions to changing the name New Deal and analyzes its political utility. It notes Roosevelt admirers and critics debate whether the term will endure beyond Pearl Harbor and into history as a mere symbol rather than a defined policy set.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Roosevelt
Washington
Pearl Harbor
Theodore Roosevelt
Supreme Court
United Action
Looking Ahead to Civilian Production Shift in 1944
Large shift to civilian production expected by mid-summer 1944 as war output winds down. Highlights include possible price drops, rationing plans, and political reshuffling with WPB leadership in focus.
Russians Close in on German Front in New Year Offensive
Col. Frederick Palmer argues the Russian winter offensive now stretches across the entire front and aims to push German forces off Russian soil. Key railway hubs Kazatin and Zhitomir fall, with Vitebsk’s capture widening the breach and threatening the Leningrad siege as the southern rail line Odessa to Lwow risks severance.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Stalingrad
Russia
Kazatin
Zhitomir
Vitebsk
Leningrad
Fense
Aegean
Odessa
Lwow
Poland
Bug
Lwow-Odessa
Rumania
Balkans
Postwar Plans for Japan Aimed at a Severe Military Licking
U S planners argue for a stern, prolonged Allied occupation to compel Japan to surrender and reform. A Pacific Control Council would govern Japan, disarmament strict, strategic minerals guarded, and Emperor Hirohito treated as a figurehead while political reform and demilitarization take effect.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Japan
Pacific Control Council
United States
Great Britain
China
Russia
Pacific
Australia
New Zealand
Canada
Netherlands
Nippon Isand
Tokyo
Washington
Association of United Nations
We Even Excel Negatively and Labor Frustrations
A humorous piece by Arthur Baer compares wartime labor jokes to production records. It notes confusion over workers’ strikes and work patterns while declaring hope to end the war and mentioning 1943 production and strike records as evidence of national effort.
1944 A Year of Decision on War Economy and Reconversion
Merryle S. Rukeyser analyzes 1944 as a pivotal year for America with war production peaking, potential budget cuts, inflation risks, and rapid reconversion plans. He warns of inflationary pressures, government investment in war plants, and the need for unified national effort to avoid civilian shortages while preparing postwar policy. He expects German victory by midyear and Japan to linger into 1945, urging proactive economic policy ahead of the 1945 administration.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Hances
War Production Board
Donald M. Nelson
Charles E. Wilson
Nelson
WPB
Jimmy Byrnes
Bernard Baruch
Wilson
General Electric
Weatherman
War Food Administration
Western Plains
Japan
York
Hitler
Pearl Harbor
Germany
East
United States
Pacific Coast
Congress
Also Mentioned on This Page
Iowa
George Stimpson
Gazette
The
Associated Press
Dwight D. Eisenhower
ETAIL
George W. Maxey
Pennsylvania
Harrison Spangler
G.O.P
John A. Danaher
R-Conn
Frank Horton
Wyoming
Commerce
Max Epstein
Chicago
Henry Kaiser
California
Army
Eisenhower
MacArthur Lodge
L. W. McCormick
Doylestown
McCormick
Senator Vandenburg
Rmich
Treasury
Beardsley Ruml
New York
By Galbraith
Emma
Col
Frederick Palmer
Col. Palmer
Kingsbury Smith
American Mercury
Yokohama
Davy Jones’ Locker
Far East
Joseph C. Grew
Churchill
Chiang Kai-shek
Hirohito
Mussolini
Nippon Dynasty
Royal Horse Guards
the Gazette
Cedar Rapids
Hawkeyes
Iowa University Board of Athletic Control
Hawkeye
Y.P.C.U. of the
United Brethren Church
Walter Baker
Jennie E. Post
M. E. Stone
A. E. Doggett
Sidney G. Smith
Clara Shuey
Isabel Robinson
Greene's Opera House
By Arthur
Bugs" Baer
Merryle S. Rukeyser
INS
War Department
Middle West
Saan Eig
General Motors Corporation