Right to Die Ethics Case Sparks Hospital Debates
Decades after the Karen Ann Quinlan decision, ethical questions persist as hospitals expand ethics committees and investigate end of life policies. The Quinlans faced the first publicized withdrawal from a respirator, while Mercy Hospital and St. Luke’s adapt with committees and living wills guiding patient wishes. Dr. Gaylin and Dr. Callahan frame ongoing debates on sanctity versus quality of life.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
George
Julie Quinlan
Karen Ann
Mrs. Quinlan
Alexandra Gekas
National Society of Patient Representatives
American Hospital Association
Commission For the Study of Ethical
St. Luke’s Hospital
Nancy Schirm
Schirm
Willard Gaylin
Hastings Center
Hastings-On- Hudson
N.Y
Daniel Callahan
Gaylin
Dying with Dignity Debates Split On Life Support
The piece discusses a split between preserving life at all costs and allowing patients to die with dignity. It cites Joseph Quinlan and Robert Spring as cases where families challenged continued life support and argues for patient or family control to withdraw treatment. The Massachusetts cases show legal caution and evolving rights.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Callahan
Joseph Quinlan
Robert Spring
Earle
Earle Spring
Massachusetts
Spring
Massachusetts Supreme Court
Attorney who helps end of life wishes becomes public figure
Richard Stanley Scott, formerly a physician, now a California attorney, champions patients rights to die. He defended Elizabeth Bouvia and William Bartling cases, urging hospitals to honor patient autonomy while reflecting on medical ethics and delayed decision making in end of life care.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Everly Hills
Calif
Richard Stanley Scott
Scott
Elizabeth Bouvin
William F. Bartling
Bartling
William J. Foster
Washington
Oregon
California
Medical
Ucla Law School
Bouvia
Riverside General Hospital
Destiny
Also Mentioned on This Page
Mercy Hospital
Mike Scott
Mercy
A.J. Levinson
Concern For Dying
New York City
Levinson
Carolyn Skorneck
Stad Press
Joseph
Karen