Congressional Debate on Slavery and Texas Boundaries in 1850
The Senate debated the proposed bill linking California's admission to U S statehood with territorial governance for Utah and New Mexico and with protections for slavery in the territories. Lincoln-like amendments and positions from Bevis Davis Yulee Foote and Clayton are noted as they clash over the reach of federal power and the right to carry enslaved people into new territory. The discussion touches on constitutional limits, the Wilmot Proviso, and the broader Compromise of 1850.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Congressional
Senate
Washington
California
Enta
Utah
New Mexico
Texas
Bevis
Mississippi
United States
Strileg
Davis
Vlat
Calhoun
Statenanny
Mexico
Culhono
Congress
Slavia
Florida
Kentucky
Hfe
Morida
North
South
Fom Misstadipur
Glivery
Foote
Yulee
Republic
Tiena
Texan
Poota
Forcaia
Bya
Republi
Chi
South Carolina
Underatoud
Heithe
Wilmer
Jongrats
Thevar
Congres
Quincy Adama
John Taylor
Caroline
Adamis
Gen. Smythe
Wythe County
Adare
Bia
Louisiana
Adama
Lousiana
Wwehn
Hichmond Enquirer
Adams
Cony Greus
Tyne
Qya Man Bey
Jefferson County
Alabama
Cethoua
Pebarary
Wigfall
Nashville
Tator
Starks
Clemons
Clemens
Hin Calf
Iia
House ‘of Representatives
Masiasippi
House of Representatives
Oregon
C. Real
Mrscote
Glomena
John Quincy Adams
Mississipp
Ras Sa Brbedeieihan
House
Senate Judiciary
Entene
Lauren Senaton
Peat Dure
Tigse
Cletus
Galiigram
Woote
W John A. Quitalan
Govenor
Miasissippi
Hyme
Wilmot
Ponte
Vis
Grater
Democratic Party
Muir Clemona
Clay
Butler
New York Sta
Granite State
Techiq
Chiris
Ee Grant
Deacon
Grant
Bil Dykes
Rey
Bill
Frost
Deacon Frost
Mr. Grant
Dony
Councelor
Grey
William
Crewlig
Moayamass
Brenthia
Butt
Also Mentioned on This Page
Josutsaen
Per. Hell
J. D. Price
Beresia
Fonte
Clamo
Avery
Webster
Payal