Debate on Brandegee Lonergan and the League of Nations
The speaker contrasts Lonergan and Brandegee as progressive and reactionary choices for Connecticut voters. He defends the League of Nations concept, recounting wartime costs and the need for international cooperation, referencing Taft and the 1914 to 1918 conflict and America’s role. He argues for action to prevent future wars and preserve civilization.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
United States
Mr. Lonergan
Brandegee
Brandgee
Senate
Brande
Ohio
Connecticut
Revere
League of Nations
Poland
Rea
Balkans
Europe
Asia
Africa
Grea
Cauce
America
Edward Grey
Russia
Austria
France
Taft
Also Mentioned on This Page
Baker
Main ST
Bridgeport, Conn
Dillon
Hartford
Conn
Bridgeport
St. Cecile
Sonnenberg
Ompan
Broad Street
Chapel St
New Haven
Rway
Yonkers
Sith Ave
Telephone
Barnum
TXTY
Sterling
Stieff Uose
Oliver
Lawson
Morocco
Boston
Juliette
The
Smith-Murray
Marquard
Brooklyn
Cleveland
Tris Speaker
Indians
C. M. Payn
Bridgeport Times
Neuss & Vaughn
W. D. Cook & Son
Water Street