Telephone Rate Reform Bill Said Beneficial to Public
The speaker argues the mild bill places telephone companies under a commission to judge rates and service. He contends business leaders back public interest, not private gain, and urges passage to help users and those who cannot afford high charges.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Massachusetts
Speaker
Rep Gallender Defends Post Bill for Public Control
Rep Gallender argues that any art or trade used by the public falls under public control and challenges critics. He cites Munn v Illinois and Chief Justice Waite to claim the public has rights over utilities and technology used by society.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Senate
State Street
Egypt
the &Th
United States
Munn
Illinois
Waite
Strong
Field
Sven
Gould
Wall Street
Supreme Court
Albert Poor Defends Telephone Rates in Massachusetts Debate
In a heated speech to the House, Albert Poor of Andover argues against state supervision of telephone companies. He cites growth in service, lower per call costs, and long distance reach from Boston to Chicago, Canada to Omaha, urging reliance on market force rather than commissions. He highlights historical legislative outcomes and defends the New England and Southern Massachusetts Telephone Companies.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
The
Post
Albert Poor
Andover
Telephone Corporation
Poor
Speaker
Commonwealth
New England Telephone Company
Massachusetts
Haverhill
Lawrence
Lowell
New Bedford
New York
Bell Telephone Company
New England
Southern Massachusetts Telephone Company
Fall River
Boston
Lynnfield
Reading
Winchester
Stoneham
Woburn
Waltham
Newtons
Wellesley
Quincy
Waverly
Bogton
Worcester
Chicago
Minneapolis
Omaha
Hoosac Mountain
North Adams
Greylock
St. Louis
San Francisco
Committee On Manufactures
House Committee On Manufactures
House
Committee On Mercantile Affairs
Railroad Commission
Gas and Electric Light Commission
Gas and Electric Light
Boston Post
Lexington
New Harmpshire
Maine
Vermont
Sion
North Carolina
States of the Union
Telephone Company
Canada
Massachusetts Presses Regulation On Quasi Public Telegraphs
Rep J J Myers of Cambridge, chair of the judiciary committee, defends the Post bill backing state oversight of the Bell Telephone Company. He argues natural monopoly justifies supervision over rates, parallels railroads and gas utilities, and urges applying the same policy to telegraphs and future extensions to other quasi public corporations. The aim is to protect the middle class and ensure fair access without imposing arbitrary rate cuts.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
State House
New York
England
Union Station
General Court
Boston
Western Union Telegraph Company
Committee On Rules
Gas and Electric Light Commission
Railroad Commission
Montreal
Speaker
Massachusetts
NewHingland Telephone Company
Commonwealth
Bell Telephone Company
Boston & Maine
New England Telephone Company
Railroads
Telephone Company
Haverhill
Post
Poor
Myers
Cambridge
Judiciary Committee
San Francisco
Bell Telephone
Desire Pie
Corporation
Gas Commission
Board of Railroad Commissioners
Public Service Corporation
Cure for the Heart claims rapid relief from palpitation
W. H. Mussel of G. A. R. in Welport, Pa, touts Dr Agnew's Cure for the Heart as curing palpitation within thirty minutes and restoring health. Woodward & Co and Sheppard & Co advertise the remedy at 1129.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
W. H. Mussel
Welsaport
Agnew
Woodward & CO
Sheppard & CO
Beecham
Debated Question On Telegraph Rates And Commission
Rep E T Rowell of Lowell opposes a bill to place telegraph companies under a commission. He recalls telegrams can be sent cheaply and questions what the bill seeks to achieve by regulating rates, urging careful consideration of the proposal.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Myers
New England
the Express
Also Mentioned on This Page
E. B. Callender
Dorchester
Mead
Wendell Phillips
Phillips
J. J. Myers
Telegraph Company
Lea
Boxee Beecham
N. K. Fairbank Company
Philadelphia
E. T. Rowell
Standard Oil Co