Taxation Law of 1801 and Its Court Battles
A historical overview discusses pre 1801 tax abuses in Indiana, the 1801 valuation law, and how advocates argued for equal cash valuation of all property. It highlights the role of the attorney general and the lengthy litigation with railroads, culminating in a U.S. Supreme Court outcome and substantial monetary results.
Indiana Tax Contention Prompts Public Duty Doctrine
A long discussion on railroad and corporate taxation in Indiana laments ongoing litigation and a U S Supreme Court settlement. It argues for a just uniform tax system, urging future officials to uphold the truce doctrine and ensure each citizen pays a fair share to fund state government and debt service.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
P Erson
2KUL
Vathwads
Interveta
Aftor- OO Acne Free Co Cien
United States
Indiana
Pullman Privileges Tax Battle Reshapes Indiana Policy
Indiana finally passed a steep tax measure after a long fight to tax Pullman Palace Car Company and other rail telegraph and express firms. Attorney General Smith led the charge, overcoming opposition from Western Union and allied lobbyists. The new statute bills the state $100,000 in back and future taxes, amid corporate resistance and legal pushback.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Pullman Palace Car Company
Indiana
Elis Oara
Pnellman
Telegraph
Express Companies
Paullman
Scott
Smith
Grouth
Lo Buy
Western Union
O ‘88
Limon
Partice
Indiana Tax Reform Triumph Over Burdensome System
The 1891 Indiana tax reform shifted the burden from individuals to a proportionate system, closing loopholes for corporations and raising revenue from all values. A contrast with Illinois shows Indiana's new code delivering fairness, while Illinois clings to the old, inequitable method.
Tax Reform Highlighted by Illinois Democratic Stand
The piece argues that corporations pay far less tax than real value while railroads evade taxes through favorable assessments. It cites Pullman Palace Car, Indiana parallels, and praises the Democratic party for enacting and enforcing equal assessments and tax laws, framing it as a public victory over monopolies.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Indiana
State Board of Equalization
Paokiman Car Company
Republican Party
Democratic Party
Emsige
Ilinois
Chicago
Pullman’s Palace Car Company
Dinois
Drea
Ina
United States
Ita
Republicanism and Democracy in Indiana Campaign
The piece contrasts Democratic reforms in Indiana over the past decade with Republican opposition. It lists laws Democrats passed on labor, mining safety, eight hour public employment, elections, tax, and reforms, then notes Republicans opposed them, including school books, ballot reform, and Pinkerton bans, pledging repeal if returned to power.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Indiana
Democratic Party
Pinkerton
Barrett
State Board of Charities
Indiana Democrats Claim Australian Ballot Reform Saved Indiana
A historic defense of the Australian ballot reform, praising Indiana for adopting the system in 1889 to end vote buying and intimidation. The piece credits the Democratic legislature and party with delivering honest elections, secrecy at the polls, and the end of “blocks of five” sales, praising long term reforms tied to fair voting.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
American Commonwealths
Australia
Indiana
Dorsey
Dudley
Democratic Party
Nyto
Also Mentioned on This Page
Pulth
Mate—Falr
Ehoa
State Board
Sol
Ioan Boris
Tade
Fyveate
Avery
Rene
Reed
Asaeeing
Credit Court
Supreme Court of Indiana
Supreme Court of the United States
Bern
Ani Saccoors
aPoeing
Supreme Court of the
Pullman
The
Illinois
Rhameless