Republican Party Achievements and Democratic Attacks Timeline
In a Toledo speech Secretary Taft frames the 1900s debate as voters choosing between Roosevelt era Republican policies and Democratic promises. The piece catalogs Republicans’ long history of national progress, from independence to modern governance, while detailing Democratic criticisms and alleged past fears used to sway voters. It emphasizes party unity, integrity, and the defense of liberty amid attacks on abolitionism, Confederation era politics, and later financial policy.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Toledo
Taft
Roosevelt
Hepublican
Democrate Party
Ursin
Republican Party
Salem
America
Democratic Party
Girai
Playes
Gerry
Una
Mayes
Garfield
Harrison
McKinley
Brandi
Cary Pillans
Jadinerwortis
Dod
Ife- Basilen Party
Jf Ubat
Lost Vision of Roosevelt Amid Prosperity Claims
A fragmentary political ode argues that dangers threaten liberty and that the Republican program under Lincoln remains the best path. It extols homestead, currency, and civil service reforms while praising wartime victory and postwar recovery under Republican governance.
Protection for depositors in postal savings banks debate
The article discusses Taft and Tafts stance on postal savings bank protection for depositors, contrasting government backed guarantees with Bryan’s plan. It argues advantages include direct government responsibility, no loss risk, and safer deposits, while noting legal and political obstacles and potential impact on bank debt.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
My. Viryan
Ca Nyke
Imanks
Tieselvent
Nike Avery Hawk
Taft
Bryan
Postal Avings Bank
Urey
Hanke Caver
Bork
Hellion
Anettier Tanerds
Redett
Denver
Hearst resigns from Iroquois Club amid Bryan split
The public letter shows W A Hearst resigning from the Iroquois Club and criticizing Democrats as a Bryan party. He questions party loyalty, accuses followers of misgovernance, and asks members to reconsider alignment with the Democratic platform. The rhetoric contrasts free silver with established party lines and ends with best wishes to the Bryan supporters.
Curtailment of Production Sparks Policy Debate
A debate over halting or curbing production within corporations surfaces. Proponents argue reducing output could lower costs or stabilize markets, while critics warn of job losses and economic harm. The discussion touches on government intervention, promoter schemes, and potential impact on workers and industry.
Capital and Labor Share in Production Debate
In a discussion from Cooper Union, New York City, speakers argue that joint interests of labor and capital depend on capital to secure production and labor to sustain it. The claim is made that the share of capital and the amount of capital used rise with more work to do, suggesting higher labor demand leads to higher pay, while productivity expands with investment and workers. The piece emphasizes balancing capital availability with labor needs to fuel production and growth.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Pial
Cmd
Gilas
Gostiehes
Sears Rej
Cmt
Wation
Shember
Thie Tellgaat Fdek
Neil Whe
Dervanos
Vhs
Messin
Realos
Orgs
Taft
Repub
Breoklyat Kagh
Capitel
Co.pe Union
New York City
Also Mentioned on This Page
Brillant Party
Sas
Nationa
Woosevelt
Neuilfald
Falan
Imoney
Lincoln
Tingolo
Lepuddivan
Ay Jong Laie
Margavatost
Best
Rousevelt
Washington
Shawn Wiether
Mrlind Ned Glock
Congress
Alas Vay Shaeada
Mateum Ospillineus Phyuers
Andy Ehoats
Shivery
Che Bey
Crug
Suttune
Cdyseatt
Supreme Court
Kansas
Noitylo
North
Yatota
Amer Lca
Dhe Disteler
Columbia
Banny
the Mail and Express Company
W. A. Hearst
Iroquois Club
Inn
Randall Demivet
de Coud
Cdis
Siggestion My
Hearst
Sant Jean Alavo
Californica
Nod Po
Tan
Dew Derade
Opr
Offtvea Satellives
eAdalge Seneeoottshees
Ryan
Fries
Democrade
Prienda
Cex-Brothers
Win
Ns Orighad
Amd
Ely
Sinesely
William Tandolptl Ibalast
This is just the beginning! Our collection holds over 300 years of history, including rare newspapers, obituaries, marriage records, birth records, and so much more—most of which you won’t find anywhere else!